Forums >
General Industry >
'Page Three' Girls in UK Newspapers
I've always thought the idea of 'Page Three' girls in some British newspapers is one that, if more widely adopted, could be rescuing the the dying newspaper industry right this minute. I also am aware that many top models got their start there. Who selects the models? Is it handled by each newspaper photo editor individually, or are there clearinghouses that supply this feature to the publications? Are American models ever used for this? Does anyone have any insights on submitting models or images for this use, contact suggestions, or other trenchant observations? Thanks! Nov 02 12 04:58 pm Link Nov 02 12 05:00 pm Link Four-Eleven Productions wrote: The newspapers have little to do with the selections [with the possible exception of the Sport]. It is a [glamour] photographer driven business. The thing is that virtually every P-3 image shot, across all the UK's red top tabloids, has been shot by one of a very few photographers numbering at any given time not more than 4 or 5 altogether. That's been true for years. Nov 02 12 05:13 pm Link Playboy Channel once ran a special title "Girls on Page Three" featuring Sam Fox, Suzanne Mizzi, Jilly Johnson, and Linda Lusardi. Beverley Goodway was the Sun's main photographer for 20+ years and most of the girls come from professional model agencies in the UK according to the introduction of his photobook "Art of Page 3". The other tabloids like Daily Star and Sport, which are rubbish, get some of their photos from syndication. I once saw Erica Rose Campbell featured on one of their covers. Nov 02 12 06:22 pm Link Thanks guys. I feel the cold water. Nov 02 12 09:45 pm Link I couldn't see them using models from the US, they generally like to have a little backstory to the girls, to conjour a bit girl next door accessibility illusion. "Holly is a good Sussex girl who likes her crumpets hot...." etc etc and yeah from the photography side of the game, it is well stitched up. As for American papers picking up the concept? That's hilarious, I think its more likely to happen in Iran first. Nov 03 12 12:57 am Link Jirrupin wrote: Do you Oz papers do P-3 girls? Nov 03 12 01:23 am Link I thought the Page 3 girl phenomenon died out when they couldn't use 16 year old girls any more. Nov 03 12 01:44 am Link Jirrupin wrote: Good point. If I had a gif of a glamour model doing a peekaboo shot wearing a burqa I would insert it here. Nov 03 12 02:53 am Link Designit - Edward Olson wrote: Not really - they just started using 18 year old models instead. Nov 03 12 08:07 am Link Jirrupin wrote: Holly does not need to be from Sussex to get a heart-melting story about a poor little ugly girl from Sussex which lost three puppets when beeing twelve and than grow up to a beautiful swan with DD cups... Nov 03 12 10:08 am Link Back in the '80s, I'm pretty sure they were on page 6. I really remember them being called page 6 girls. When did they switch to page 3? Nov 03 12 10:17 am Link Carlos Occidental wrote: I'm pretty sure you're wrong. AFAIK they've always been on Page 3 - hence the name 'Page 3 girls" Nov 03 12 10:18 am Link a shame we didn't import this idea from England... would boost newspaper circulation substantially... Nov 03 12 10:21 am Link Carlos Occidental wrote: I can remember hearing of "page 3 girls" back to the 70's, even though I've never lived in the UK. Nov 03 12 01:26 pm Link Four-Eleven Productions wrote: Unless you're going to show a 12-15 page colour pictorial of 18-19 year olds fully nude and fashionably, but seductively clothed in a newspaper at least once weekly, there isn't a chance that such would bring newspapers back from the brink. What would be the draw? ... something 10x more boring that what everyone can see online at the drop of a hat without spending one red cent? You'd might as well publish a photo of a nun sitting on a bench with an old lunch pail in her grips. Not exciting enough for the public to want to pay for it. That's the problem. Nov 03 12 01:54 pm Link Four-Eleven Productions wrote: Those mags pay squat anymore, which is why most of those girls now do other things... nudie call-in tv shows, escorting etc. I worked with some (like LDM) waaaay back in the 90ies and some of them are still around and now do those nighttime call-in shows to pay the bills. Nov 03 12 01:59 pm Link Art of the nude wrote: Page 3 and come to think of it (well not literally!) that archaic rag 'The Sun', should have been left in the 70's. It's such a dated and tedious idea, both the paper and page 3! Nov 03 12 02:04 pm Link London Fog wrote: There is some element of newspaper tradition involved. Tradition = something you keep doing long after the original reason for doing it is completely forgotten. Nov 03 12 06:20 pm Link DEP E510 wrote: The only thing it would boost is people standing in line for a free hand out. Even the good looking gals in bikinis handing out freebies during spring break can't get people to buy the products they're pushing- mostly winds up being a waste unless you have a product that people are interested in buying anyway. Nov 03 12 08:33 pm Link The Sun Page 3 girls are under contract and can only appear in The Sun, unless it's with regard to an actual piece of news. The Sun uses one photographer for all there shots. They do have competitions, to find new talent, each year. But you must have no silicone, which excludes many established models and newbies. The Daily Sport is the lowest denomination and has the most bare flesh, but that is really struggling. It's gone from 7 to I think one day a week The Star is between The Sun and the Sport. They don't tend to be as fussy and will accept girls that have been in the Sport. As the Sport tend's to re-use old photo sets of girls that can be years old. There is very little crossover between the Star and Sun. They have to be exceptional and normally only go one way. Nov 04 12 12:49 pm Link The "Page 3 girls" worked for a long time ... and we had a magazine in the US called Autobuff which featured topless models inside posed with classic muscle cars. I assisted on a couple of those centerfold shoots and provided the locations too. Like many magazines from the 80's and 90's, the Internet along with obscenity laws has caused many to go out of business or to publish online. Autobuff didn't change fast enough with the tech World, so they are one of many publications gone now. The topless magazine thing is a difficult "sale" in the United States because of the new obscenity laws requiring even such limited nudity type magazines as Autobuff to be sold behind the counter like Penthouse and Playboy are. Just because you have a topless image in your newspaper, it would have to be sold from behind the counter too. It wasn't always required to be displayed that way in the 80's and 90's. Good luck with you idea! Nov 04 12 02:13 pm Link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toronto_Sun The Sun was first published on November 1, 1971, the Monday after the demise of the Toronto Telegram, a conservative broadsheet. As there was no publishing gap between the two papers and many writers and employees moved to the new paper, it is today generally considered as a direct continuation of the Telegram, and the Sun is the holder of the Telegram archives. The Toronto Sun is modeled on British tabloid journalism, even borrowing the name of The Sun newspaper published in London, and some of the features, including the typically bikini-clad Sunshine Girl, who was on the same page as the British paper. Unlike its British counterpart, the Toronto Sun has never had a "topless" Sunshine Girl. Comment: As far as I know, it was always in house photographers who shot the Sunshine Girl for the Toronto Sun. So it was only girls who could shoot in Toronto. If they were paid in the beginning, that practice stopped long ago. Now the girls are on the last page -2. Not sure why they changed. I think they wanted to lose some of the negative thoughts about having a sexy girl, in what they wanted people to believe was a serious newspaper. But they never had the balls to drop the girl entirely. Nov 04 12 06:20 pm Link Carlos Occidental wrote: Labels without comprehension are amazing. I'm impressed by the tight correlation of cluelessness between pop culture and fine art culture. Nov 04 12 07:19 pm Link Just FYI - Beverley Goodway died yesterday after losing a long fight with cancer... RIP http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/ne … -dies.html Nov 05 12 08:35 am Link I can't see how adding a single photo of a topless girl would increase circulation here in the US. All across this country people have computers, laptops, Ipads, or smart phones, where they can view a tidal wave of high res porn and nudes in an instant. That would be like adding a strip of bacon to every salad in a health food store, in order to get fat people out of the drive thru line at McDonald's. Nov 05 12 08:53 am Link RKD Photographic wrote: Ah sad to hear that , I never met him but I was responsible for processing his E6 Nov 05 12 09:04 am Link Rob Mac Studio wrote: I remember scanning wet negs to try and beat the competition...took about 45 minutes to scan and transmit an image - madness... Nov 05 12 10:38 am Link Eros Fine Art Photo wrote: I'm sure it would increase some men's circulation. Nov 05 12 10:45 am Link RKD Photographic wrote: I just got his book this week. Nov 05 12 10:48 am Link DEP E510 wrote: no you're lucky! you don't want anything from that oily, lying effing rag! Nov 05 12 11:02 am Link studio36uk wrote: Beverley Goodway (RIP) probably the best known page 3 photographer. Nov 05 12 11:58 am Link Even if I had the girls for it, I wouldn't know where to start Nov 05 12 12:07 pm Link |