Forums > General Industry > Isn’t This Prohibited?

Artist/Painter

aquarelle

Posts: 2056

Chicago, Illinois, US

I received this PM in response to a casting I posted:

“Hey Aquarelle
This is *****from ******Talent- www.******.Com
I saw your casting call so I thought I'd reach out to you
for potential collaboration. We are a new licensed talent agency that
books actors and models all over the U.S.

We have a model in Chicago that can do the shoot.
I've left a link below for your reference.

(Model’s name)- https:*****Talent.com, etc.

We make booking talent quick and easy and do not charge any booking/agency fees.
We are here to assist with your talent needs for your productions
however possible.
Just let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you!”

(Agents name)
Phone #
(Email and website)

The guy who sent me this has an MM profile as a Los Angeles model. The Chicago model he is referring to me has her own MM profile.  Isn’t this a violation of MM rules?

I’d appreciate your observations regarding this.

Nov 14 22 10:15 pm Link

Photographer

Jason McKendricks

Posts: 6024

Chico, California, US

Sluggos are indeed prohibited.

Nov 14 22 10:29 pm Link

Photographer

G Reese

Posts: 914

Marion, Indiana, US

I'd refer it to the mods for investigation. Not seeing a blatant red flag, but no harm in checking.

Nov 15 22 11:07 am Link

Artist/Painter

aquarelle

Posts: 2056

Chicago, Illinois, US

Had the model responded directly to my casting, I might have hired her.  Due to this “agent’s” intervention, I won’t.

He helped her lose a gig.

Nov 15 22 11:38 am Link

Photographer

Shot By Adam

Posts: 8098

Las Vegas, Nevada, US

aquarelle wrote:
Had the model responded directly to my casting, I might have hired her.  Due to this “agent’s” intervention, I won’t.

He helped her lose a gig.

You should send her a message telling her that and CC him on it.

Nov 19 22 07:01 am Link

Photographer

G Reese

Posts: 914

Marion, Indiana, US

aquarelle wrote:
Had the model responded directly to my casting, I might have hired her.  Due to this “agent’s” intervention, I won’t.

He helped her lose a gig.

Please send me a privet message with the "agents" listing. I don't mind working through agents.

Nov 19 22 09:30 am Link

Photographer

Brooklyn Bridge Images

Posts: 13200

Brooklyn, New York, US

Fake Agent

Nov 19 22 12:09 pm Link

Moderator

Mod 7 (Cust. Svc.)

Posts: 26127

El Segundo, California, US

Moderator Note!
Yes, please do flag that PM for us. Such things are not permitted here and should be reported.

How to do that
https://www.modelmayhem.com/education/u … w-to-guide

Nov 19 22 02:25 pm Link

Clothing Designer

veypurr

Posts: 464

Albuquerque, New Mexico, US

G Reese wrote:

Please send me a privet message with the "agents" listing. I don't mind working through agents.

I see more and more independent non agency type agents acting on behalf of models. Not on Model Mayhem per se but just in general.

Nov 19 22 04:59 pm Link

Photographer

G Reese

Posts: 914

Marion, Indiana, US

veypurr wrote:

I see more and more independent non agency type agents acting on behalf of models. Not on Model Mayhem per se but just in general.

And it toke 4 days to get it reported to the mods. If I got a PM like that, I'd report it to the mods first not post it here.
Had one of those "managers" operating in my area a while back.  Three profiles disappeared within the hour..

Nov 20 22 07:47 am Link