Model
Pathogenic Confessions
Posts: 20332
Racine, Minnesota, US
Problem: I have 15/10 vision and can't convince myself to pay $120 on frames that I don't NEED.
But, I've always thought I look better with glasses and have wanted them since I was a child. (For those of them that need them, don't get mad at me)
Photographer
scrymettet
Posts: 33239
Quebec, Quebec, Canada
Photographer
- Phil H -
Posts: 26552
Mildenhall, England, United Kingdom
Nikki A wrote:
Problem: I have 15/10 vision and can't convince myself to pay $120 on frames that I don't NEED.
But, I've always thought I look better with glasses and have wanted them since I was a child. (For those of them that need them, don't get mad at me) Cheap off the shelf reading glasses from Rite Aid with weakest possible lens?
Model
Pathogenic Confessions
Posts: 20332
Racine, Minnesota, US
scrymettet wrote:
steal it ? You always have the best advice.
Wait...i know I haven't been around much but....you moved?
Model
Pathogenic Confessions
Posts: 20332
Racine, Minnesota, US
- Phil H - wrote:
Cheap off the shelf reading glasses from Rite Aid with weakest possible lens? Even with the weakest lens, I'll probably get horrible migraines from them.
At the eyeglass store they have plain glass lens, so I was trying on pairs and I look hot
Photographer
scrymettet
Posts: 33239
Quebec, Quebec, Canada
Nikki A wrote:
You always have the best advice.
Wait...i know I haven't been around much but....you moved? not recently, why asking ?
Photographer
- Phil H -
Posts: 26552
Mildenhall, England, United Kingdom
Nikki A wrote:
Even with the weakest lens, I'll probably get horrible migraines from them.
At the eyeglass store they have plain glass lens, so I was trying on pairs and I look hot Buy them as a photographic prop and write them off as a "work" expense on your tax return?
Model
Pathogenic Confessions
Posts: 20332
Racine, Minnesota, US
scrymettet wrote:
not recently, why asking ? I just noticed, but I only stop round here a few minutes a week.
Model
Pathogenic Confessions
Posts: 20332
Racine, Minnesota, US
- Phil H - wrote:
Buy them as a photographic prop and write them off as a "work" expense on your tax return? 
I should
Photographer
scrymettet
Posts: 33239
Quebec, Quebec, Canada
Nikki A wrote:
I just noticed, but I only stop round here a few minutes a week. last time I moved was 10 years ago.
I think you are taking me for somebody else.
Model
Pathogenic Confessions
Posts: 20332
Racine, Minnesota, US
scrymettet wrote:
last time I moved was 10 years ago.
I think you are taking me for somebody else. Seriously?
I'm sorry if I am, but I thought.....
>.< Nevermind, I shouldn't go online when I'm sick, I make a fool out of myself.
Sorry, now I feel bad 
Model
Jacqui L
Posts: 1217
Rolla, Missouri, US
I've found a few really cool pairs at vintage stores (in Billings, MT, of all places) that had clear plastic lenses. Didn't hurt the eyes. 
Photographer
scrymettet
Posts: 33239
Quebec, Quebec, Canada
Nikki A wrote:
Seriously?
I'm sorry if I am, but I thought.....
>.< Nevermind, I shouldn't go online when I'm sick, I make a fool out of myself.
Sorry, now I feel bad *muuuah*
thank you for caring to ask.
Model
Pathogenic Confessions
Posts: 20332
Racine, Minnesota, US
Jacqui L wrote:
I've found a few really cool pairs at vintage stores (in Billings, MT, of all places) that had clear plastic lenses. Didn't hurt the eyes. I'm going to have to look for a cheap pair, but I found the cutest pair at the Sears
Model
Pathogenic Confessions
Posts: 20332
Racine, Minnesota, US
scrymettet wrote:
*muuuah*
thank you for caring to ask. For some reason I thought you lived in Wisconsin.
Model
Pathogenic Confessions
Posts: 20332
Racine, Minnesota, US
Nikki A wrote:
For some reason I thought you lived in Wisconsin. I think my migraine fried my brain
Photographer
scrymettet
Posts: 33239
Quebec, Quebec, Canada
Nikki A wrote:
For some reason I thought you lived in Wisconsin. If I were, I would have been pesting you for a shoot
Model
Pathogenic Confessions
Posts: 20332
Racine, Minnesota, US
scrymettet wrote:
If I were, I would have been pesting you for a shoot This is boggling my mind, I mean I could have swore....
>.
Photographer
scrymettet
Posts: 33239
Quebec, Quebec, Canada
Nikki A wrote:
This is boggling my mind, I mean I could have swore....
>.
Model
Pathogenic Confessions
Posts: 20332
Racine, Minnesota, US
scrymettet wrote:
are you physic ? I do take physics
Photographer
scrymettet
Posts: 33239
Quebec, Quebec, Canada
Nikki A wrote:
I do take physics that explain the stuff.
Dark matters, space time continuum, wrap speed.
Photographer
Skipshots
Posts: 13421
Atlanta, Georgia, US
scrymettet wrote:
that explain the stuff.
Dark matters, space time continuum, wrap speed. ASTROphysics counts, I guess.
Model
Pathogenic Confessions
Posts: 20332
Racine, Minnesota, US
Newstart Photography wrote:
ASTROphysics counts, I guess. o.0
Photographer
scrymettet
Posts: 33239
Quebec, Quebec, Canada
Nikki A wrote:
o.0 you look hot with glasses
Model
Pathogenic Confessions
Posts: 20332
Racine, Minnesota, US
scrymettet wrote:
you look hot with glasses Damn straight
Photographer
scrymettet
Posts: 33239
Quebec, Quebec, Canada
Nikki A wrote:
Damn straight too bad it's not in my glasses
Photographer
Skipshots
Posts: 13421
Atlanta, Georgia, US
Nikki A wrote:
Damn straight I wanna see the Nikki in eyeglasses.
Photographer
Jim Ewing
Posts: 4577
Riverside, California, US
Nikki A wrote:
Problem: I have 15/10 vision and can't convince myself to pay $120 on frames that I don't NEED.
But, I've always thought I look better with glasses and have wanted them since I was a child. (For those of them that need them, don't get mad at me) Simple, hit up that GWC that's been wanting to shoot you and tell him you'll only shoot if he gets some shots of you in your new frames. Unfortunately you can't get them right now, so he'll have to buy them for you or wait. If he waits, you'll probably forget about him, or won't want to shoot with him. TFF...trade for frames.
You're welcome.
|
