Model
Marlene Vice
Posts: 85
Porto, Norte, Portugal
Lauren A Farrington wrote:
I don't think it flatters you. The pose is decent, but the expression is mediocre and the light is no good. The one next to it is better, and I would recommend it as your avatar. Thank you ![smile](//assets.modelmayhem.com/images/smilies/smile.png)
Model
Melissa Lytle
Posts: 2
Columbia, South Carolina, US
#2 please. would love to know ur opinion
Model
Kate Jenkins
Posts: 31
Yelm, Washington, US
I would love you know #1 and 2 (:
Photographer
Lauren A Farrington
Posts: 999
Sunderland, Massachusetts, US
Melissa Lytle wrote: #2 please. would love to know ur opinion Best:
Worst:
![https://modelmayhm-2.vo.llnwd.net/d1/photos/100129/19/4b63a4e72bd39_m.jpg]()
Photographer
Lauren A Farrington
Posts: 999
Sunderland, Massachusetts, US
Kate Jenkins wrote: I would love you know #1 and 2 (: Best:
Worst:
Avatar: current
Photographer
Lauren A Farrington
Posts: 999
Sunderland, Massachusetts, US
Bekah Jenkins wrote: 1 and 2 please? Best:
Worst:
Avatar:
![https://modelmayhm-6.vo.llnwd.net/d1/photos/100201/15/4b67616b5270b_m.jpg]()
Model
Kate Baxter
Posts: 121
Houston, Texas, US
Number 2 please! I just put in a couple of new photos and am looking to see what people think. And if I could get an opinion on avatar than would be great. ![smile](//assets.modelmayhem.com/images/smilies/smile.png)
Photographer
Lauren A Farrington
Posts: 999
Sunderland, Massachusetts, US
Kate Baxter wrote: Number 2 please! I just put in a couple of new photos and am looking to see what people think. And if I could get an opinion on avatar than would be great. ![smile](//assets.modelmayhem.com/images/smilies/smile.png) Best:
Worst:
Avatar: Current, fo' sho.
Model
Dane Halo
Posts: 1154
San Francisco, California, US
![](//assets.modelmayhem.com/images/vip.png)
Model
joanna anderson
Posts: 122
Portsmouth, England, United Kingdom
Hi havn't got a lot of pics but can you do '2' please x
Model
Aswald
Posts: 3471
Detroit, Michigan, US
Photographer
Lauren A Farrington
Posts: 999
Sunderland, Massachusetts, US
joanna anderson wrote: Hi havn't got a lot of pics but can you do '2' please x Best:
Worst:
![https://modelmayhm-6.vo.llnwd.net/d1/photos/100201/04/4b66c630d8d6b_m.jpg]()
Model
Scarlette OShea
Posts: 289
Kansas City, Kansas, US
Let me know! Whichever you want to do!
Photographer
Lauren A Farrington
Posts: 999
Sunderland, Massachusetts, US
Scarlette OShea wrote: Let me know! Whichever you want to do! Best:
Worst:
![https://modelmayhm-7.vo.llnwd.net/d1/photos/100202/13/4b689ca754135_m.jpg]()
Photographer
Mike Chaiken
Posts: 1089
Bristol, Connecticut, US
Model
Emma-Marie
Posts: 129
Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
# 3. And my question is: The two first pictures (Burlesque) theme are new.. I think they look too overtouched, but I would love to know what you think! If you could suggest an avatar, that would be awesome too ![smile](//assets.modelmayhem.com/images/smilies/smile.png)
Model
Stess
Posts: 80
Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Hi sounds good, imkeen for whichever one ![smile](//assets.modelmayhem.com/images/smilies/smile.png) thanks!! x
Model
BrookeElese
Posts: 5
Winterville, North Carolina, US
Number 1 and number 2 pretty please?
Model
JD Noble
Posts: 5
Chandler, Arizona, US
just cant sleep. so have fun. and remember im new to this...
Model
Courtney Rapp
Posts: 38
Washington, District of Columbia, US
Photographer
Photons 2 Pixels Images
Posts: 17011
Berwick, Pennsylvania, US
This one seems popular. I'll go with #2
Photographer
Lauren A Farrington
Posts: 999
Sunderland, Massachusetts, US
Mike Chaiken wrote: 2 Best:
Worst:
![https://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/100101/07/4b3e197749cc0_m.jpg]()
Photographer
Lauren A Farrington
Posts: 999
Sunderland, Massachusetts, US
Emma-Marie wrote: # 3. And my question is: The two first pictures (Burlesque) theme are new.. I think they look too overtouched, but I would love to know what you think! If you could suggest an avatar, that would be awesome too ![smile](//assets.modelmayhem.com/images/smilies/smile.png) I agree; they're too blurred and I don't like the colors of the first one. I think you could probably afford to ditch them. And for an avatar:
![https://modelmayhm-2.vo.llnwd.net/d1/photos/091208/00/4b1e07ec98848_m.jpg]()
Photographer
Lauren A Farrington
Posts: 999
Sunderland, Massachusetts, US
Stess wrote: Hi sounds good, imkeen for whichever one thanks!! x Best:
Worst:
![https://modelmayhm-8.vo.llnwd.net/d1/photos/091027/19/4ae7b10d15bdc_m.jpg]()
Photographer
Lauren A Farrington
Posts: 999
Sunderland, Massachusetts, US
Steven S Hood wrote: 1 & 2 Best:
Worst:
Avatar:
![https://modelmayhm-9.vo.llnwd.net/d1/photos/100130/11/4b6481e08c70d_m.jpg]()
Model
Riva_G
Posts: 466
New York, New York, US
#2 please ![smile](//assets.modelmayhem.com/images/smilies/smile.png)
Photographer
Lauren A Farrington
Posts: 999
Sunderland, Massachusetts, US
BrookeElese wrote: Number 1 and number 2 pretty please? Best:
Worst:
Avatar:
![https://modelmayhm-9.vo.llnwd.net/d1/photos/100129/08/4b6306335c391_m.jpg]()
Model
amycore
Posts: 419
Los Angeles, California, US
Photographer
Lauren A Farrington
Posts: 999
Sunderland, Massachusetts, US
Justin Bonaparte wrote: Two to tango. Best:
Worst:
![https://modelmayhm-2.vo.llnwd.net/d1/photos/090111/22/496adc6148e6f_m.jpg]()
Photographer
Lauren A Farrington
Posts: 999
Sunderland, Massachusetts, US
Tyler Schultz wrote: #2 please Best:
Worst:
![https://modelmayhm-2.vo.llnwd.net/d1/photos/080610/23/484f40d9aa98a_m.jpg]()
Photographer
Lauren A Farrington
Posts: 999
Sunderland, Massachusetts, US
Courtney Rapp wrote: 1 and 2 please? Best:
Worst:
Avatar:
![https://modelmayhm-6.vo.llnwd.net/d1/photos/091213/11/4b253af9a7fd4_m.jpg]()
Photographer
Lauren A Farrington
Posts: 999
Sunderland, Massachusetts, US
Photons 2 Pixels Images wrote: This one seems popular. I'll go with #2 Best:
Worst:
![https://modelmayhm-1.vo.llnwd.net/d1/photos/100128/10/4b61d60ab6908_m.jpg]()
|