Forums >
General Industry >
A Model's Right to Retouch Her Images.
This post originally made under Tyler's stated Terms and Conditions, which did not make any claim to the right to modify and sell uploaded content. Now that Internet Brands has put a new TOC in place, which does make that claim, I no longer am willing to have my works on this site. The new TOC says, in part: By displaying or posting content on the Site, you hereby grant us a nonexclusive global license to publish the content submitted by you to the Site. You also grant us global nonexclusive adaptation and resale rights over any content and material submitted to the Site. These nonexclusive publishing license and resale/adaptation rights extend to any materials submitted "for publication" within the Site, including both message board postings and content submitted for uploading and subsequent publishing within non-message board portions of the Site. Jun 07 07 12:12 pm Link This post originally made under Tyler's stated Terms and Conditions, which did not make any claim to the right to modify and sell uploaded content. Now that Internet Brands has put a new TOC in place, which does make that claim, I no longer am willing to have my works on this site. The new TOC says, in part: By displaying or posting content on the Site, you hereby grant us a nonexclusive global license to publish the content submitted by you to the Site. You also grant us global nonexclusive adaptation and resale rights over any content and material submitted to the Site. These nonexclusive publishing license and resale/adaptation rights extend to any materials submitted "for publication" within the Site, including both message board postings and content submitted for uploading and subsequent publishing within non-message board portions of the Site. Jun 07 07 12:12 pm Link This post originally made under Tyler's stated Terms and Conditions, which did not make any claim to the right to modify and sell uploaded content. Now that Internet Brands has put a new TOC in place, which does make that claim, I no longer am willing to have my works on this site. The new TOC says, in part: By displaying or posting content on the Site, you hereby grant us a nonexclusive global license to publish the content submitted by you to the Site. You also grant us global nonexclusive adaptation and resale rights over any content and material submitted to the Site. These nonexclusive publishing license and resale/adaptation rights extend to any materials submitted "for publication" within the Site, including both message board postings and content submitted for uploading and subsequent publishing within non-message board portions of the Site. Jun 07 07 12:13 pm Link This post originally made under Tyler's stated Terms and Conditions, which did not make any claim to the right to modify and sell uploaded content. Now that Internet Brands has put a new TOC in place, which does make that claim, I no longer am willing to have my works on this site. The new TOC says, in part: By displaying or posting content on the Site, you hereby grant us a nonexclusive global license to publish the content submitted by you to the Site. You also grant us global nonexclusive adaptation and resale rights over any content and material submitted to the Site. These nonexclusive publishing license and resale/adaptation rights extend to any materials submitted "for publication" within the Site, including both message board postings and content submitted for uploading and subsequent publishing within non-message board portions of the Site. Jun 07 07 12:13 pm Link This post originally made under Tyler's stated Terms and Conditions, which did not make any claim to the right to modify and sell uploaded content. Now that Internet Brands has put a new TOC in place, which does make that claim, I no longer am willing to have my works on this site. The new TOC says, in part: By displaying or posting content on the Site, you hereby grant us a nonexclusive global license to publish the content submitted by you to the Site. You also grant us global nonexclusive adaptation and resale rights over any content and material submitted to the Site. These nonexclusive publishing license and resale/adaptation rights extend to any materials submitted "for publication" within the Site, including both message board postings and content submitted for uploading and subsequent publishing within non-message board portions of the Site. Jun 07 07 12:13 pm Link This post originally made under Tyler's stated Terms and Conditions, which did not make any claim to the right to modify and sell uploaded content. Now that Internet Brands has put a new TOC in place, which does make that claim, I no longer am willing to have my works on this site. The new TOC says, in part: By displaying or posting content on the Site, you hereby grant us a nonexclusive global license to publish the content submitted by you to the Site. You also grant us global nonexclusive adaptation and resale rights over any content and material submitted to the Site. These nonexclusive publishing license and resale/adaptation rights extend to any materials submitted "for publication" within the Site, including both message board postings and content submitted for uploading and subsequent publishing within non-message board portions of the Site. Jun 07 07 12:14 pm Link This post originally made under Tyler's stated Terms and Conditions, which did not make any claim to the right to modify and sell uploaded content. Now that Internet Brands has put a new TOC in place, which does make that claim, I no longer am willing to have my works on this site. The new TOC says, in part: By displaying or posting content on the Site, you hereby grant us a nonexclusive global license to publish the content submitted by you to the Site. You also grant us global nonexclusive adaptation and resale rights over any content and material submitted to the Site. These nonexclusive publishing license and resale/adaptation rights extend to any materials submitted "for publication" within the Site, including both message board postings and content submitted for uploading and subsequent publishing within non-message board portions of the Site. Jun 07 07 12:14 pm Link This post originally made under Tyler's stated Terms and Conditions, which did not make any claim to the right to modify and sell uploaded content. Now that Internet Brands has put a new TOC in place, which does make that claim, I no longer am willing to have my works on this site. The new TOC says, in part: By displaying or posting content on the Site, you hereby grant us a nonexclusive global license to publish the content submitted by you to the Site. You also grant us global nonexclusive adaptation and resale rights over any content and material submitted to the Site. These nonexclusive publishing license and resale/adaptation rights extend to any materials submitted "for publication" within the Site, including both message board postings and content submitted for uploading and subsequent publishing within non-message board portions of the Site. Jun 07 07 12:14 pm Link This post originally made under Tyler's stated Terms and Conditions, which did not make any claim to the right to modify and sell uploaded content. Now that Internet Brands has put a new TOC in place, which does make that claim, I no longer am willing to have my works on this site. The new TOC says, in part: By displaying or posting content on the Site, you hereby grant us a nonexclusive global license to publish the content submitted by you to the Site. You also grant us global nonexclusive adaptation and resale rights over any content and material submitted to the Site. These nonexclusive publishing license and resale/adaptation rights extend to any materials submitted "for publication" within the Site, including both message board postings and content submitted for uploading and subsequent publishing within non-message board portions of the Site. Jun 07 07 12:14 pm Link These things should be clearly stated and spelled out in the usage licence/ agreement. Jun 07 07 12:15 pm Link This post originally made under Tyler's stated Terms and Conditions, which did not make any claim to the right to modify and sell uploaded content. Now that Internet Brands has put a new TOC in place, which does make that claim, I no longer am willing to have my works on this site. The new TOC says, in part: By displaying or posting content on the Site, you hereby grant us a nonexclusive global license to publish the content submitted by you to the Site. You also grant us global nonexclusive adaptation and resale rights over any content and material submitted to the Site. These nonexclusive publishing license and resale/adaptation rights extend to any materials submitted "for publication" within the Site, including both message board postings and content submitted for uploading and subsequent publishing within non-message board portions of the Site. Jun 07 07 12:15 pm Link This post originally made under Tyler's stated Terms and Conditions, which did not make any claim to the right to modify and sell uploaded content. Now that Internet Brands has put a new TOC in place, which does make that claim, I no longer am willing to have my works on this site. The new TOC says, in part: By displaying or posting content on the Site, you hereby grant us a nonexclusive global license to publish the content submitted by you to the Site. You also grant us global nonexclusive adaptation and resale rights over any content and material submitted to the Site. These nonexclusive publishing license and resale/adaptation rights extend to any materials submitted "for publication" within the Site, including both message board postings and content submitted for uploading and subsequent publishing within non-message board portions of the Site. Jun 07 07 12:15 pm Link Above I have posted explanations, opinions of experts, federal Appeals Court decisions, selection from a scholarly article, and a quotation from the United States Copyright office, as well as selections of the relevant parts of copyright law. They all point in the same direction. That said, this seems to be an emotional issue with many people, and no matter what I have posted, I know there will be those who feel the need to disagree with it. Now is the time, if you must. Jun 07 07 12:15 pm Link Jun 07 07 12:16 pm Link And the summary is......? Jun 07 07 12:16 pm Link I tell my photogs first hand. Before we shoot I would like you to know I intend to request raw images, I will save you any immediate trouble as I intend to retouch my own. (most of the time I do a better job of it as a 10 year adobe vet and a schooled gaphic artist), So it's nice to know that there are no legal bindings. Thanks TX! Jun 07 07 12:17 pm Link Invenova wrote: On the first post. In bold letters. Jun 07 07 12:20 pm Link thanks Jun 07 07 12:21 pm Link As an attorney I can say that Tx is basically correct (as usual), although every situation is different and there are exceptions to all rules. But as a PRACTICAL matter, any retouching is so minimal and the use so minimal that no one will do anything about it anyway, except get pissed off. Jun 07 07 12:22 pm Link This post originally made under Tyler's stated Terms and Conditions, which did not make any claim to the right to modify and sell uploaded content. Now that Internet Brands has put a new TOC in place, which does make that claim, I no longer am willing to have my works on this site. The new TOC says, in part: By displaying or posting content on the Site, you hereby grant us a nonexclusive global license to publish the content submitted by you to the Site. You also grant us global nonexclusive adaptation and resale rights over any content and material submitted to the Site. These nonexclusive publishing license and resale/adaptation rights extend to any materials submitted "for publication" within the Site, including both message board postings and content submitted for uploading and subsequent publishing within non-message board portions of the Site. Jun 07 07 12:23 pm Link excellent post RT.. Jun 07 07 12:23 pm Link Ahh, sad but true. I miss the days when only graphics professionals had Photoshop. PS - Thank you for taking the time to post this. Jun 07 07 12:24 pm Link TX..... i'm really starting to like you.... Jun 07 07 12:28 pm Link Nikki Kruex wrote: 10 years?? Jun 07 07 12:29 pm Link Thank you for this TX. Jun 07 07 12:30 pm Link I am confused. Can you explain that again starting from the words "Opening Statement?" Jun 07 07 12:33 pm Link TX I have to say I mentioned the legality of it (which you have so nicely stated) and then stayed away in the last post simply because I am way too busy to argue with people who want to argue from a point of what they think is right rather than what is factual or legal based, I commend you for having the intiative to continue to argue with these people to try to get the truth through. Personally I feel most of them are, and are working with wannabes and non real world high end clients/models, people so it is really not of any real practical benifit or test of the law since most will never file a large suit against the "girl" who badly retouched thier pic from a "TFP" shoot, and I see the level of their work and people they work with and understand where all the "model will retouch badly and destroy my good name by showing it" comes from. When working with high end clients and models/agents/AD's/Retouching houses etc this is a non issue since we are all actually quaility first type personalities Good luck defending the reality against the quasi religious zelots that cling to what they would like to believe rather than what is true. Stephen Eastwood http://www.PhotographersPortfolio.com Jun 07 07 12:39 pm Link Jun 07 07 12:40 pm Link You know, TX, a slight acknowledgment would have been nice.... Jun 07 07 12:41 pm Link Nikki Kruex wrote: You have ever right to make that request, however, I think any photographer that would agree to it is insane... Jun 07 07 12:42 pm Link Paramour Productions wrote: Quite right. It's fixed. Heat of battle thing, or battle fatigue, will be my excuse. Jun 07 07 12:43 pm Link Always is good to read TX posts. Jun 07 07 12:46 pm Link Thank you. I bookmarked this thread out of others because I liked the clear and verifiable foundation for the points being made. This is the type of commentary that I find truly useful compared to others that are contaminated with emotional and subjective fluff. Jun 07 07 12:46 pm Link so can i then assume that i can retouch a model any way i choose put her name under the photo and post it anywhere on the web or put it in my port? just curious? r Jun 07 07 12:47 pm Link TXPhotog wrote: You're a Prince among men. Jun 07 07 12:48 pm Link Nikki Kruex wrote: Paramour Productions wrote: Just because a model may be permitted to retouch images herself doesn't mean that she has a right to whatever images she wants or that she will be provided them in RAW or unedited format. In negotiating and granting the license, the photographer still has full control over what he will provide (while the model is free to decline the shoot if she isn't getting what she wants). Jun 07 07 12:49 pm Link richard boswell wrote: retouching and publishing are two different areas. If you have a valid model release which would allow you to publish the image, then the answer is yes. Your physical port would typically be exempt from the release requirement, however an online port is somewhat of a grey area - best to have the release. Jun 07 07 12:50 pm Link TXPhotog wrote: Amen Jun 07 07 12:50 pm Link Alan from Aavian Prod wrote: Nikki Kruex wrote: Just because a model may be permitted to retouch images herself doesn't mean that she has a right to whatever images she wants or that she will be provided them in RAW or unedited format. In negotiating and granting the license, the photographer still has full control over what he will provide (while the model is free to decline the shoot if she isn't getting what she wants). This is absolutely true and it was the point of my getting involved in the other thread in the first place. The point is for photographer's to understand what they need to provide in the form of a usage license so that bad retouching does not occur. Part of the problem, quite frankly, is internet photographers who actually do provide all images (raw or otherwise) from a shoot. This practice is as absurd as it is unprofessional. Jun 07 07 12:52 pm Link how about.... photographer wrecks the shape of my leg in photoshop... i crop the photo to not include the deformed leg... he threatens to sue? Jun 07 07 12:53 pm Link |