What do you think? Mar 04 10 11:44 am Link I think people usually like to look their best, even vampires, so if you did photograph a vampire with a bloody mouth it would either be during (or interrupting) a moment when he thinks he's alone, or if he is posing for a portrait, then the blood would be subtle and unintentional. I don't think a vampire would pose for a portrait that says, "look how much of a vampire I am." But you never know... Edit is fine. the blood is improved, for sure. Maybe the blue eyes are too out of mood with the rest of the idea. Try making the shadows colder. Mar 04 10 11:52 am Link i think the blood is good, but oversharpened. It doesn't sit with the rest of the shot (which is a bit fuzzy). And I agree about the eyes. I'd leave 'em b&w. Mar 04 10 12:02 pm Link NothingIsRealButTheGirl wrote: In other words: Mar 04 10 12:05 pm Link Thanks guys. This is me like 4 years ago btw Mar 04 10 01:40 pm Link i like the mood of this image most of the things that caught my eye have been mentioned before. one more thing- the white dots on the eyelashes, i would get rid of them. Mar 04 10 02:38 pm Link In theory, you did the right thing: pales skin, glowing eyes, etc. But it looks like too much for me. When I'm not sure about how much punch to give an image, I will add the original back on top in a layer, and lower the opacity. Basically I'm saying, do the same post work routine, but LESS of it. ; ) Mar 04 10 11:40 pm Link IMHO it is very well done. Mar 04 10 11:48 pm Link |