Forums >
General Industry >
Boundaries
Posted by theda: Posted by Chill Factor: I must have missed the part where anyone besides you (and maybe a couple of others on your side) advocated censorship. Please point it out to me. As far as I can tell, everyone thinks you have as much right to mouth off as the next guy. wait i didnt see this part,,, I AM NOT ADVOCATING CENSORSHIP,, before any one else writes ONE MORE THING please read from page one. I am talking about NOT contributing to the sickness in our culture. I have a right to voice that idea. Apr 25 05 10:02 pm Link Posted by Viva Van Story: Posted by KoolGirlieStuff: Posted by Viva Van Story: Posted by Chill Factor: Posted by Viva Van Story: Controversial images are apart of art today! Let's face reality! OK NOW! This attitude FROSTS Chill right into a GLACIER! If eating excrement were to suddenly become "art" or trendy or cool,,how many here would be the first to do it? Accepting this stuff as art, is ludicrous! You are not going to win here.. do you want someone to decide if your photos are art or not? Pick up the book, Art Matters, how the culture wars changed america... you may not like someone's work but it doesn't make it not art to everyone. I'll let the glaciers cover me whole before I'll take that freedom away from my work. Some of my favorite photographers/artists are controversial artists. If the photographer used a model dressed up like Betty Page or Tempest Storm all tied up and gaged - people would have loved it.. I know because I do them and my fans LOVE them.. they are funny and cute and they are all acting and playing.. just like in that photographers portfolio.. so he needs some help on his photography tech stuff.. it's all about trying things out and enjoying the learning experience. Who are we to decide his subject material? If you are going to be an opened minded individual you should think about this a little more before responding again. Here I go defending a fetish......... And this is why I love you.. smart as a whip! I love you too Viva! Apr 25 05 10:10 pm Link Posted by theda: Posted by Chill Factor: I must have missed the part where anyone besides you (and maybe a couple of others on your side) advocated censorship. Please point it out to me. As far as I can tell, everyone thinks you have as much right to mouth off as the next guy. I am not impressed with hordes of pseudo intellectuals, what does impress me are the few people who have the GUTS to see this material for what it is and say " You know what,,this is harmful to society in a variety of ways, and I am going to point it out and call it what is is,,,GARBAGE". Apr 25 05 10:30 pm Link Posted by Chill Factor: Are you really that incapable of accepting that not everyone agrees with your take on this subject? Apr 25 05 10:34 pm Link Posted by theda: Posted by Chill Factor: Are you really that incapable of accepting that not everyone agrees with your take on this subject? Are you Theda really that incapable of seeing that I don't care who disagrees with me on this? As I have said all along it only adds to the BIG picture part of the problem. Apr 25 05 10:38 pm Link This thread started from a distasteful image to now, people arguing. This is about as controversial as gay rights, religion etc. And with that said, I am pretty open minded. I don't close my mind off to things like that. To get to the point, there are a lot of not so good photographers out there that would shoot "jail bait". There are people out there that are going to notice pics like the one mentioned on the first page which started this whole thread and they are going to say something about it. Maybe because they are concerned and looking out for others...who knows. Not all fetishes are a bad thing to each their own, I may not agree to ALL of them, but some of them are not that bad either. This site is different because it does "weed" out most of the things that you would find on OMP and other sites. "Art" can be a variety of things, I agree. I am not bashing fetishes, I may not agree with all of them, but like mentioned before...to each their own. Same way with porn, it may not be for me, but again, whatever. I have seen a lot of photographers workings that I like and some include nudity, so it isn't that I am against that either, obviously like said before, there are markets out there, and you can avoid them if it isn't "your thing". There are also a lot of creeps out there too....the "monkey see, monkey do" kind of people, and some explicit pics can give them ideas. There are many different views on things. And everyone should respect the "opinions" stated. Not everyone will agree on the definition of art, and for porn and fetish, well that is just a sexuality preference (a turn on). I respect all posts made, so don't get me wrong, but there is good and bad to everything. Opening your mind to see all consequences is not a bad thing, but prepares you for what could come out of it. McKenzie Apr 25 05 10:38 pm Link Posted by McKenzie: The voice of REASON! Finally! Apr 25 05 10:45 pm Link This is an interesting discussion...and I tend to agree with McKenzie and others who have said that while I may not agree with everything, total censorship is not the answer. However, there is also nothing wrong with someone saying "you know what, I'm not going to want that banned or censored, but I also don't want it in my house/website/museum, etc." Choosing not to view something is as much a right as choosing to create something. I am curious however...for those who totally oppose all censorship of any kind...is there anything off limits, or would you support any theme, any subject matter? Where are the limits drawn in your personal views? Keep in mind, the more permissive a great society becomes, the greater the internal strife which shall hasten it's collapse from within. I realize that we all to some extent celebrate freedom and the First Amendment...but to have no rules, no governance, will result in anarchy and the total breakdown of society. Without rules and law, there is no society...and without morals, there are no rules or law. Apr 25 05 10:53 pm Link Posted by theda: Posted by Chill Factor: Are you really that incapable of accepting that not everyone agrees with your take on this subject? I see that I am outnumbered ,who cares? Apr 25 05 11:03 pm Link Aside from not screaming "fire" in a crowded theater, I really don't have personal limits. I can't think of any topic that in and of itself I wouldn't want to see the subject of humor, art or discussion. Of course, this oactually puts me in the minority. The fact that we have a thread in which a small majority seems to be in support of (or at least not against) violent erotica here is an anomoly to say the least. I think society as a whole is a lot more conservative than that. Apr 25 05 11:14 pm Link Posted by theda: Wether someone likes or dislikes violent erotica, wether or not there is a market for it, just exactly what ( other than the obvious) positive impact can it possibly have in the world? People can listen to various forms of music and itlifts their spirits,, that's a positive contribution..People can indulge in various other forms of artistic expression, and benefit in countless other ways . Seriously I want to know what this form of art contributes to the world that can make it a better place? I am not seeing it, someone point out the pluses to Chill! Apr 25 05 11:36 pm Link First off, I did the wrong thing by pointing out 193 and his work. It was very unprofessional of me and I am sorry for not knowing better. Bad PR i sbetter than none, so at least I will not feel all that bad about it in the end. Anything I talked about was not making it illeagle, is was more about having a morel oblagation. Either way, I am not here ot push my veiws down peoples pie holes. I am here to network with great talent and better my own art. I will for now on let my work talk for me and keep my pie hole shut. Again, sorry for posting your profile, I was wrong to do so. Apr 25 05 11:37 pm Link Posted by Chill Factor: I've addressed this twice. Sublimation of desires that are inherent to human nature in a non-violent way. I suggest reading Wendy McElroy and Nadine Strossen for an in-depth discussion, if it's not too pseudo-intellectual for you. Apr 25 05 11:43 pm Link Posted by theda: Posted by Chill Factor: I've addressed this twice. Sublimation of desires that are inherent to human nature in a non-violent way. I suggest reading Wendy McElroy and Nadine Strossen for an in-depth discussion, if it's not too pseudo-intellectual for you. Ok good will check it out,,if it makes any kind of sense at all, Chill will comprehend but not necessarily AGREE. Apr 25 05 11:48 pm Link Lets just kill this! Whats the point really. I could tell you my sister in law was tied up raped and murdered. I could tell you they found all sorts of magizines filled with the same images of the muder scene. But so what, if we want we can find excuses to say this was to blame, that was to blame. Matters not to anyone but the family of that young women who is to blame. I guess if the girls were smiling it would be diffrent maybe, ballons and ice cream cake, I dunno.. F IT! Apr 25 05 11:59 pm Link If we really want to look at the "big picture," let's try looking at how these discussions deterioriate into nastiness and personal attacks and how they reveal the insensitivity, intolerance, and mean spirit that seem to be becoming the norm in contemporary society. Just look at what happened last week with Lexi's post about plus modeling. I'm not the most internet savvy guy and my ventures into the Model Mayhem forums represent my first experiences with these kinds of discussions. I've found it to be highly educational, the stuff that sociological studies and books are made of. No doubt, the "creative" community is every bit as screwed up as the rest of scoiety. Apr 25 05 11:59 pm Link Posted by Herb Way: I 2nd that motion. Apr 26 05 12:03 am Link Posted by Steven LaMarco: Posted by Herb Way: I 2nd that motion. Stay strong, Steve! Apr 26 05 12:11 am Link U 2 brother. Apr 26 05 12:13 am Link Posted by Steven LaMarco: I'm reminded of the title of an old Milt Jackson LP, "Aint But a Few of Us Left" Apr 26 05 12:19 am Link Wow! What an interesting discussion. If I could throw my two cents in... This is why I love to study the Classics so much- these same issues have been going on since the beginning of what we call "art" itself. Although, my favorite male Latin poets liked to portray themselves in bondage at the mercy of their cruel mistress. This is the stuff that the whole fabric of our society has been woven upon. I have to say that since I was a child I have had a facination with many images of bondage, fetishism, and erotic art, long before I had any idea what "erotic" was. I feel that there is a great deal of beauty, humor and drama in a lot of it, just as in any other art form. And then some of it is just lousy work, just as in any other art form in any other century. But let's not forget that what one generation called trash, subsequent generations often built civilizations upon, and in my field we look back on all of it, tag it, catalogue it, and label it art. I also was in the "punk" school of philosophy as a teen- chokers and bondage bracelets and spikes and all- in which I firmly believed that a word, image or idea only had a certian power if society gave it that power. For example, a beautiful woman bound and suspended perfectly in the ancient art of Japanese rope tying is only a victim if we percieve her to be. The few times I have been that woman, I have felt empowered and decorated by a gifted craftsman, and on display as a work of art. All of the shame that you may feel will not rub off on me, even if you feel the need to cast it my way. It was wonderful. But if we lock all the Japanese rope bondage in the closet, not only will it become more interesting to me, it will probably take on a new air of 'dirty' that it did not have before, and I will have to go underground to find someone to tie me up right, and girls and guys to watch get tied up. I'm sorry, I just think it's gorgeous when it's done well, and I would have to find a black market. That black market would flood with all the 16 year olds who just heard the word on the new way to make a quick buck, and the twenty-somethings who were doing it professionally and because they loved it would be out of work. It's when you start hiding things in the closet that they start to be taken over by scary individuals, because the demand and hence the money flows there. If they are open to the fresh air, you may find that even you see beauty where you only saw fear before, and the seediness may just move into something you thought was clean before.- But it will never go away. Without shadows, we'd have no light. Funny statement on a photo thread. Then there is the idea of women as victims, and the work my friends and I have done in groups like "Take back the night" and as counselors for abuse victims and girls with eating disorders, etc. Often women who have been victims of rape or abuse feel a strong need, and a great source of empowerment through reliving past events but with different outcomes, where they have control and choices in those situations. This of course is an extremely complicated topic, and much too broad for this thread. For anyone who has lost someone to a violent crime, I feel sorrow for your loss, but I honestly and deeply feel that it is the closeting of ideas and images that causes the desire for control, violence and hatred towards women- and men and boys and girls and animals, etc. But speaking of censorship and making people uncomfortable, and as a victim, in my adult life, of an assault, which has made viewing some images quite difficult for me, (mostly in movies- not photos) I can understand the uncomfortability that some people may feel. I have always been a fan of the ratings system, and think that it should include intense sexual and violent images. Just like the little box we should check for nudity, why can't I post my photo of myself in a Bettie Page type pose, but check the box for 'suggestive pose' in the event a 12 year old or someone who is offended by scenes of bondage or violence or nudity needs to be warned? Of course the 12 year old should be restricted, but the adult veiwer, like myself, could at least have fair warning before opening the picture. Just my two cents. Apr 26 05 12:41 am Link Veronica, your 2 cents is worth at least twice as much. You're wise beyond your years. Apr 26 05 12:47 am Link Veronica - Well said ... very well said. Apr 26 05 12:49 am Link What Veronica has said sounds to me like the final word. To each his own. Please let this thread end now. Apr 26 05 04:33 am Link Posted by Steven LaMarco: Apology accepted. Apr 26 05 06:08 am Link Posted by emac: Well said..this should draw to an end Apr 26 05 06:43 am Link Posted by Alex Alexander: Posted by emac: Well said..this should draw to an end "Blessed is the man who has nothing to say and can't be persuaded to say it." -- Edward R. Murrow Apr 26 05 07:51 am Link |