GER Photography wrote:
Hehe!! Ok, hit me!!:-))

https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/10092558

The title says it all, as in "did I just allow someone to take a boudoir picture of me with an assault rifle?". There's incongruity, and then there's this. This is the kind of photo that makes me feel bad for traveling full time models, who sometimes produce great work, but other times have to take gigs like this to pay the bills. Yes... weird.

MatureModelMM wrote:
Just do it please, you won't have any trouble at all finding one or more of those.......   

If you'd like, I'll explain the logic behind whichever one you choose, since the concepts were explained to me by the photographers or artists who directed my poses.

https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/38643749

I'm pretty sure it would get worse if you explained the logic. I imagine the photographer's thought process was "I have a really interesting idea, it might mean something but I haven't thought about it that hard. Problem is I only have one light, a leftover king size sheet, a couple of paper plates and a Sharpie, so we will have to make do with that." Then you find out that it's not even a Sharpie, it's a 6 year old Marksalot because Sharpies are hella expensive. I also imagine the direction was something along the lines of "OK now for this one act happy! You know, like, put your hands over your head, like happy people do!" Yes... weird.

Anders Loost wrote:

https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/10092558

The title says it all, as in "did I just allow someone to take a boudoir picture of me with an assault rifle?". There's incongruity, and then there's this. This is the kind of photo that makes me feel bad for traveling full time models, who sometimes produce great work, but other times have to take gigs like this to pay the bills. Yes... weird.

Oh boo hoo!! Anti gun drivel from someone from "San Francisco" not really suppriseing! Pitiful!

GER Photography wrote:

Oh boo hoo!! Anti gun drivel from someone from "San Francisco" not really suppriseing! Pitiful!

It's not so much anti gun as "anti gun-between-the-legs-in-lingerie." Guns don't kill people, people making models pose with guns in lingerie kill people.

Nor-Cal Photography wrote:
I'll play!

https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/p … 7#33811545

You: "Move a little bit forward"
Model: "OK"
You: "Nope, move a little bit back"
Model: "Um, OK"
You: "Now a little bit to the side"
Model: "OK, but it seems like maybe my entire face is in the shadow now?"
You: "Yes, that's the whole idea!"
Model: "But don't people think it's really weird when a dude posts photos of his junk and doesn't show his face?"
You: "No, people actually love photos like that, it's highly erotic!"
Model: "Really? Are you sure?"
You: "Yes, totally sure! Trust me!"
Model: "We're the same person, aren't we?"
You: "Yes, we are"

Weird... yes.

Anders Loost wrote:
https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/38643749

I'm pretty sure it would get worse if you explained the logic. I imagine the photographer's thought process was "I have a really interesting idea, it might mean something but I haven't thought about it that hard. Problem is I only have one light, a leftover king size sheet, a couple of paper plates and a Sharpie, so we will have to make do with that." Then you find out that it's not even a Sharpie, it's a 6 year old Marksalot because Sharpies are hella expensive. I also imagine the direction was something along the lines of "OK now for this one act happy! You know, like, put your hands over your head, like happy people do!" Yes... weird.

Actually it was shot in a college studio with professional background and equipment.........by another MM member.

As I recall, about 30-40 people total volunteered to model nude for a student's project, which was about body image, and there was actually a web page showing all of us a few years back. The concept was simple we were supposed to draw our feelings on a paper plate rather quickly, then that would be used to cover our face while photographed. The second pose with arms raised and a happy face was to show off my underarm hair since I am very proud to remain natural, because it has helped me immensely in getting modelling assignments in a world where nearly all the female models are shaved or waxed bare everywhere. It was a lot of fun to do, and certainly a different concept than one usually sees.

Marla Pandora wrote:
Haha this sounds fun, go for it!

Unfortunately, the weirdness in your portfolio is largely limited to the "hmmm... weirdly eclectic" variety of weird. So it's hard to throw much stink on it. I suppose some would call that a good thing. The best I can come up with is:



which was apparently composed to provide the viewer, at first glance, with an eyeful of your giant, firm, very pointy, and weirdly nipple-free boobs, only to realize on closer inspection that they are in fact your knees.

Anders Loost wrote:

Unfortunately, the weirdness in your portfolio is largely limited to the "hmmm... weirdly eclectic" variety of weird. So it's hard to throw much stink on it. I suppose some would call that a good thing. The best I can come up with is:



which was apparently composed to provide the viewer, at first glance, with an eyeful of your giant, firm, very pointy, and weirdly nipple-free boobs, only to realize on closer inspection that they are in fact your knees.

Haha! That really made me laugh
Ps: love your port btw

Anders Loost wrote:

It's not so much anti gun as "anti gun-between-the-legs-in-lingerie." Guns don't kill people, people making models pose with guns in lingerie kill people.

LOL