Forums > General Industry > Taxes and Write-Offs

Model

Zura

Posts: 43

Jacksonville, Florida, US

For a sole proprietor model reporting taxes- does anyone know how to record cash payments from private shoots (i.e. a photographer who is practicing his craft and isn't an established business). Can this still be recorded into tax profits? If so, what all information is needed?

I've been searching google and still haven't found adequate information on this yet.

Thanks for any help with this.

Oct 08 22 03:50 pm Link

Photographer

Weldphoto

Posts: 845

Charleston, South Carolina, US

Though I am no CPA it would seem to me that you would report it as any other income. It would be part of your total for the quarter. It is the photographer's concern how he/she wants to report it as a business expense.  Again, I am not a tax person other than paying taxes for more years than I care to remember!  Good for you for being responsible!

Oct 08 22 06:32 pm Link

Photographer

Mark Salo

Posts: 11731

Olney, Maryland, US

Regardless of what form you use for reporting your income and calculating your tax owed, I'm sure that there is a line for listing misc income.

https://www.irs.gov/filing/free-file-do … s-for-free

What Is IRS Free File?

The IRS Free File Program is a public-private partnership between the IRS and many tax preparation and filing software industry companies who provide their online tax preparation and filing for free. It provides two ways for taxpayers to prepare and file their federal income tax online for free:

    Guided Tax Preparation provides free online tax preparation and filing at an IRS partner site. Our partners deliver this service at no cost to qualifying taxpayers. Taxpayers whose AGI is $73,000 or less qualify for a free federal tax return.

https://apps.irs.gov/app/freeFile/browse-all-offers/

I don't know if this helps.
https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f1040sc.pdf
SCHEDULE C  Profit or Loss From Business

Oct 08 22 08:54 pm Link

Photographer

Dan Howell

Posts: 3574

Kerhonkson, New York, US

Not in any way an accountant, but I have been doing this from the photographer side for a long time. It is your responsibility to report income regardless of the method of payment. You can create a 'paper trail' by saving a bank deposit slip recording date and amount.

However, I do not like chasing scraps of paper and I use Quickbooks as a bookkeeping assist and do almost all of my banking electronically. Even if you don't send to the photographer, you can create an invoice and record of payment within Quickbooks (or similar application). Quickbooks has many options for quarterly or annual reports that I use to track income and expenses which I turn over to my certified tax preparer to create my Schedule C for the year. From what I understand, documentation can take a variety of forms but it is advised to be regular and consistent in the manner you record it.

Not advice, but an example of what has been successful for me.

Oct 09 22 04:21 am Link

Photographer

MoRina

Posts: 67

Neumayer - permanent station of Germany, Sector claimed by Norway, Antarctica

As a sole proprietor, I report all my business income and expenses on Schedule C. All the income goes on Line 1 - you will total all 1099's and cash you received.
Throughout the year, I track all of my income and expenses in a google sheets spreadsheet. I found it helpful to look at the categories of expenses on the Schedule C and track them that way so the totals are all ready to transfer over at tax time. Google sheets is free and accessible from your phone or computer.
As a sole proprietor I also am required to pay estimated tax quarterly to the IRS. When I lived in a state that had income tax I also had to send in estimated tax payments to the state throughout the year. All you do is log on to irs.gov and set up an account to pay your estimated taxes.

Oct 09 22 04:44 am Link

Artist/Painter

Hunter GWPB

Posts: 8197

King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, US

I have a main business and a couple of peripheral things that I earn money from doing.  My invoices show the source and my books may separate the items in a spreadsheet, but at the end of the day, they are all 'remittance received," or "cash in."  The only reason I would distinguish the cash in would be if some was subject to sales tax and some was not.  Or if there was some other tax structure that required distinctions in the records. 

I work on a cash in/cash out basis.  My income isn't determined by my invoicing.  The reason is, if I have a client stiff me, I don't want to pay taxes on that money and then depreciate it out over a period of years.   

The only other time that I will handle cash in differently, is when it is a refund from the taxing authorities or a vendor.  In which case, I will enter into the books as a negative in the column. Then it reflects as a lower expense for that period.

If your after legitimate business expenses income is subject to federal withholding, social security, medicare, state and local taxes (along the same veins), then it is ultimately the same.  Money is fungible. 

However, seeking advice from a CPA is advisable.  Setting your books up to mimmic the forms required by the IRS, as previously mentioned, saves you a lot of headaches latter.

Oct 09 22 08:37 am Link

Model

Zura

Posts: 43

Jacksonville, Florida, US

Thanks SOO MUCH for all of these detailed responses.
It helps give me some direction and also helps with knowing what other specific terms to use to further my own research.

Will study up on this a bit more soon.

<333

Oct 09 22 11:41 am Link

Photographer

Manfred

Posts: 65

Stuttgart, Baden-Württemberg, Germany

Zura wrote:
For a sole proprietor model reporting taxes- does anyone know how to record cash payments from private shoots (i.e. a photographer who is practicing his craft and isn't an established business). Can this still be recorded into tax profits?

You simply write a bill including your tax number. And there should be a model release indicating the payment you get. It should me written in the model release that the payment is in cash. But basically I prefer models who accept bank transfer payments.

Jan 14 23 01:36 am Link

Artist/Painter

Hunter GWPB

Posts: 8197

King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, US

Manfred wrote:

You simply write a bill including your tax number. And there should be a model release indicating the payment you get. It should me written in the model release that the payment is in cash. But basically I prefer models who accept bank transfer payments.

No!  Do not give people your tax ID numbers- especially if you use you social security number instead of a federal EIN number.  You probably won't have an EIN unless you have employees, but you can get one on the premise that you will have employees.  I have never once put a tax ID number on an invoice in 33 years of being in business.

There is a possibility that someone could ask you for a W-9.  That would have either your EIN or SS number.  It is better to use your EIN.  After receiving your EIN, they should send you a 1099.  However, these are both unnecessary pieces of paperwork for most people- completely uncalled for if you are working with amateurs.

I have never asked for tax ID information from a model and have never provided 1099s.  I have never received an invoice from a model and would not expect to.  I pay cash on delivery. 

In my business, I sometimes provide an invoice if it is requested- usually not because I am paid in advance and the contract specifies all the terms and documents the transaction.  I get paid by check and it is very unusual that I have to provide any tax ID information- and then only to corporate clients and pita lawyers.

The government will compare your tax returns to records, like bank deposits, if you get audited.  If you keep a spread sheet indicating the name and source of each transaction, that should be plenty.  Cash businesses, like a restaurant, obviously don't keep tract of every cash customer's name.  You could list your income by date, but too much information is better than not enough. 

Don't live a lifestyle that is greater than your reported income!

Jan 14 23 06:07 am Link

Model

Model MoRina

Posts: 6639

MacMurdo - permanent station of the US, Sector claimed by New Zealand, Antarctica

Hunter  GWPB wrote:
No!  Do not give people your tax ID numbers- especially if you use you social security number instead of a federal EIN number.  You probably won't have an EIN unless you have employees, but you can get one on the premise that you will have employees.  I have never once put a tax ID number on an invoice in 33 years of being in business.

There is a possibility that someone could ask you for a W-9.  That would have either your EIN or SS number.  It is better to use your EIN.  After receiving your EIN, they should send you a 1099.  However, these are both unnecessary pieces of paperwork for most people- completely uncalled for if you are working with amateurs.

I have never asked for tax ID information from a model and have never provided 1099s.  I have never received an invoice from a model and would not expect to.  I pay cash on delivery. 

In my business, I sometimes provide an invoice if it is requested- usually not because I am paid in advance and the contract specifies all the terms and documents the transaction.  I get paid by check and it is very unusual that I have to provide any tax ID information- and then only to corporate clients and pita lawyers.

The government will compare your tax returns to records, like bank deposits, if you get audited.  If you keep a spread sheet indicating the name and source of each transaction, that should be plenty.  Cash businesses, like a restaurant, obviously don't keep tract of every cash customer's name.  You could list your income by date, but too much information is better than not enough. 

Don't live a lifestyle that is greater than your reported income!

I'd like to point out that a model doing nudes is already required to sign a 2257 release, which includes their social security number.  You said here that you use 2257 releases: https://www.modelmayhem.com/forums/post … st19968197
And if you are paying a model over $600 (total in a year) you are required to file a 1099.

Jan 14 23 06:36 am Link

Artist/Painter

Hunter GWPB

Posts: 8197

King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, US

Model MoRina wrote:
I'd like to point out that a model doing nudes is already required to sign a 2257 release, which includes their social security number.
And if you are paying a model over $600 (total in a year) you are required to file a 1099.

Thank you for bring these points up.  It is always good to have to review such matters.

You are right if a model is being paid over $600 a year from a business, the model should be prepared to supply a W-9 and receive a 1099.  But I don't, because hiring any model is outside the purview of my business.  "Businesses are required to issue a 1099 form to a taxpayer (other than a corporation) who has received at least $600 or more in non-employment income during the tax year." [1] Also, the $600 threshold is key.  I won't speak for others, but I rarely, if ever, do over $600 worth of shooting with any one model in a year. 

I can spend over $600 a year at one business- say maintaining small engines- but I do not have to send a 1099.  There is a list of situations in which a 1099 is required here:  https://www.irs.gov/forms-pubs/about-form-1099-misc

Most of my customers are not a business in any form. It is extremely rare for any of my customers to pay me less than $600 for my services, and of varying numbers of customers each year, I may get one or two 1099s.  Those are from other businesses that are passing through a payment from their client to me, or they are a business where I was a direct business expense.  And attorneys, as noted.  (Last tax season I had an attorney demand a W-9 from me and I refused because he was not my client.  He had reimbursed my client for work that he benefited from, but he was not my client.  I received zero funds from him directly and my actual client was the one obligated to send a 1099.  His 1099 would have indicated a different source of money that would have appeared to be additional money.  If he needed to send anyone a 1099, it was the person he gave the funds to.)

In hiring a model, for me anyway, it is not a business expense.  If I am not claiming it as an expense, it is not any of the IRS's concern how much money I spend on models any more than how much money I spend on ice cream, ... or stable fees. (Horses are expensive!)  I make no effort to sell paintings and if I chose to do a commission piece, which I am way to busy to do, the customer has never been a business entity, so I have never gotten a 1099, and I can "Use [a separate] Schedule C (Form 1040) to report income or loss from a[n art] business you [ I ] operated or a profession you [ I ] practiced as a sole proprietor. An activity qualifies as a business if: (1) Your primary purpose for engaging in the activity is for income or profit. (2) You are involved in the activity with continuity and regularity," and as such, neither condition is true for my art.  Ultimately, I show my accountant everything I made each year and everything I spent and she handles the paperwork, which has never included a single 1099 going out. (I do the W-2s myself.)

As for 2257, the act says "producers of pornography, or depictions of any sexual activity using actual people, are required to verify that the performers are of legal age (18–years–old or older) by maintaining records of the performers’ names and ages."  I usually photograph the driver's license, which is tied to the social security number at the DMV and the government can access that, but I can't.  I have never asked for a SS number from a model.  Unless I see it written in the law somewhere, or case law, I am not going to ask for it, because I am not engaging in a business activity (at this time) photographing paid models..

Maybe I am doing it wrong.  Please show me something that I have missed in the law or case law which requires a SS# for shooting porn- (which I also don't do).  2257 is not required for doing art nudes, but I understand the reasoning in getting the form signed in any nude scenario because there is ambiguity in the wording as to when it is required and it is open to the exaggeration of prosecutors with an agenda.

I looked at various 2257 forms that are available on line and some have a space for SS#s.  Some don't.  Here is one of them: https://apagunion.com/wp-content/upload … ms-PDF.pdf


(a)Whoever produces any book, magazine, periodical, film, videotape, digital image, digitally- or computer-manipulated image of an actual human being, picture, or other matter which—
(1)contains one or more visual depictions made after November 1, 1990 of actual sexually explicit conduct; and
(2)is produced in whole or in part with materials which have been mailed or shipped in interstate or foreign commerce, or is shipped or transported or is intended for shipment or transportation in interstate or foreign commerce;
shall create and maintain individually identifiable records pertaining to every performer portrayed in such a visual depiction.
(b)Any person to whom subsection (a) applies shall, with respect to every performer portrayed in a visual depiction of actual sexually explicit conduct—
(1)ascertain, by examination of an identification document containing such information, the performer’s name and date of birth, and require the performer to provide such other indicia of his or her identity as may be prescribed by regulations;
(2)ascertain any name, other than the performer’s present and correct name, ever used by the performer including maiden name, alias, nickname, stage, or professional name; and
(3)record in the records required by subsection (a) the information required by paragraphs (1) and (2) of this subsection and such other identifying information as may be prescribed by regulation.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2257

[1] https://www.investopedia.com/financial- … 1099s.aspx
https://www.irs.gov/businesses/small-bu … ion-return
https://www.justice.gov/criminal-ceos/1 … ifications


other sources:   https://www.gdnlaw.com/practice-areas/i … 28-cfr-75/
Here are a few definitions that are especially important:

§ 75.1 Definitions.

(b) Picture identification card means a document issued by the United States, a State government, or a political subdivision thereof, or a United States territory, that bears the photograph, the name of the individual identified, and the date of birth of that individual, and provides specific information sufficient for the issuing authority to confirm its validity, such as a passport, Permanent Resident Card (commonly known as a “Green Card”), or employment authorization document issued by the United States, a driver’s license or other form of identification issued by a State or the District of Columbia; or a foreign government-issued equivalent of any of the documents listed above when the person who is the subject of the picture identification card is a non-U.S. citizen located outside the United States at the time of original production and the producer maintaining the required records, whether a U.S. citizen or non-U.S. citizen, is located outside the United States on the original production date. The picture identification card must be valid as of the original production date.

Jan 14 23 02:40 pm Link

Model

Model MoRina

Posts: 6639

MacMurdo - permanent station of the US, Sector claimed by New Zealand, Antarctica

Hunter  GWPB wrote:
Thank you for bring these points up.  It is always good to have to review such matters.

You are right if a model is being paid over $600 a year from a business, the model should be prepared to supply a W-9 and receive a 1099.  But I don't, because hiring any model is outside the purview of my business.  "Businesses are required to issue a 1099 form to a taxpayer (other than a corporation) who has received at least $600 or more in non-employment income during the tax year." [1] Also, the $600 threshold is key.  I won't speak for others, but I rarely, if ever, do over $600 worth of shooting with any one model in a year. 

I can spend over $600 a year at one business- say maintaining small engines- but I do not have to send a 1099.  There is a list of situations in which a 1099 is required here:  https://www.irs.gov/forms-pubs/about-form-1099-misc

Most of my customers are not a business in any form. It is extremely rare for any of my customers to pay me less than $600 for my services, and of varying numbers of customers each year, I may get one or two 1099s.  Those are from other businesses that are passing through a payment from their client to me, or they are a business where I was a direct business expense.  And attorneys, as noted.  (Last tax season I had an attorney demand a W-9 from me and I refused because he was not my client.  He had reimbursed my client for work that he benefited from, but he was not my client.  I received zero funds from him directly and my actual client was the one obligated to send a 1099.  His 1099 would have indicated a different source of money that would have appeared to be additional money.  If he needed to send anyone a 1099, it was the person he gave the funds to.)

In hiring a model, for me anyway, it is not a business expense.  If I am not claiming it as an expense, it is not any of the IRS's concern how much money I spend on models any more than how much money I spend on ice cream, ... or stable fees. (Horses are expensive!)  I make no effort to sell paintings and if I chose to do a commission piece, which I am way to busy to do, the customer has never been a business entity, so I have never gotten a 1099, and I can "Use [a separate] Schedule C (Form 1040) to report income or loss from a[n art] business you [ I ] operated or a profession you [ I ] practiced as a sole proprietor. An activity qualifies as a business if: (1) Your primary purpose for engaging in the activity is for income or profit. (2) You are involved in the activity with continuity and regularity," and as such, neither condition is true for my art.  Ultimately, I show my accountant everything I made each year and everything I spent and she handles the paperwork, which has never included a single 1099 going out. (I do the W-2s myself.)

As for 2257, the act says "producers of pornography, or depictions of any sexual activity using actual people, are required to verify that the performers are of legal age (18–years–old or older) by maintaining records of the performers’ names and ages."  I usually photograph the driver's license, which is tied to the social security number at the DMV and the government can access that, but I can't.  I have never asked for a SS number from a model.  Unless I see it written in the law somewhere, or case law, I am not going to ask for it, because I am not engaging in a business activity (at this time) photographing paid models..

Maybe I am doing it wrong.  Please show me something that I have missed in the law or case law which requires a SS# for shooting porn- (which I also don't do).  2257 is not required for doing art nudes, but I understand the reasoning in getting the form signed in any nude scenario because there is ambiguity in the wording as to when it is required and it is open to the exaggeration of prosecutors with an agenda.

I looked at various 2257 forms that are available on line and some have a space for SS#s.  Some don't.  Here is one of them: https://apagunion.com/wp-content/upload … ms-PDF.pdf


(a)Whoever produces any book, magazine, periodical, film, videotape, digital image, digitally- or computer-manipulated image of an actual human being, picture, or other matter which—
(1)contains one or more visual depictions made after November 1, 1990 of actual sexually explicit conduct; and
(2)is produced in whole or in part with materials which have been mailed or shipped in interstate or foreign commerce, or is shipped or transported or is intended for shipment or transportation in interstate or foreign commerce;
shall create and maintain individually identifiable records pertaining to every performer portrayed in such a visual depiction.
(b)Any person to whom subsection (a) applies shall, with respect to every performer portrayed in a visual depiction of actual sexually explicit conduct—
(1)ascertain, by examination of an identification document containing such information, the performer’s name and date of birth, and require the performer to provide such other indicia of his or her identity as may be prescribed by regulations;
(2)ascertain any name, other than the performer’s present and correct name, ever used by the performer including maiden name, alias, nickname, stage, or professional name; and
(3)record in the records required by subsection (a) the information required by paragraphs (1) and (2) of this subsection and such other identifying information as may be prescribed by regulation.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2257

[1] https://www.investopedia.com/financial- … 1099s.aspx
https://www.irs.gov/businesses/small-bu … ion-return
https://www.justice.gov/criminal-ceos/1 … ifications


other sources:   https://www.gdnlaw.com/practice-areas/i … 28-cfr-75/
Here are a few definitions that are especially important:

§ 75.1 Definitions.

(b) Picture identification card means a document issued by the United States, a State government, or a political subdivision thereof, or a United States territory, that bears the photograph, the name of the individual identified, and the date of birth of that individual, and provides specific information sufficient for the issuing authority to confirm its validity, such as a passport, Permanent Resident Card (commonly known as a “Green Card”), or employment authorization document issued by the United States, a driver’s license or other form of identification issued by a State or the District of Columbia; or a foreign government-issued equivalent of any of the documents listed above when the person who is the subject of the picture identification card is a non-U.S. citizen located outside the United States at the time of original production and the producer maintaining the required records, whether a U.S. citizen or non-U.S. citizen, is located outside the United States on the original production date. The picture identification card must be valid as of the original production date.

The 2257 form you linked does indeed have a space for SS# in section C on page 2. Look, I'm not the 2257 police. I don't actually give a rat's patootie what you personally do. I'm just correcting the bad info you gave earlier. You have stated you ask your models to sign 2257 forms, even though here you claim you don't need them. I live in the real world of selling my work and I'm going to go with what I know. When I modeled for others I was always required to sign a 2257 that included my SS# and give my id to be photographed. Sometimes I was required to fill in a W-9. It also requires my social security number. So, for you to say a model should never give their social security number out is bad information.

Jan 14 23 03:00 pm Link

Artist/Painter

Hunter GWPB

Posts: 8197

King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, US

Model MoRina wrote:
The 2257 form you linked does indeed have a space for SS# in section C on page 2. Look, I'm not the 2257 police. I don't actually give a rat's patootie what you personally do. I'm just correcting the bad info you gave earlier. You have stated you ask your models to sign 2257 forms, even though here you claim you don't need them. I live in the real world of selling my work and I'm going to go with what I know. When I modeled for others I was always required to sign a 2257 that included my SS# and give my id to be photographed. Sometimes I was required to fill in a W-9. It also requires my social security number. So, for you to say a model should never give their social security number out is bad information.

I do request a 2257 even though I don't need them. So what?  How is that relevant?  I also explained why I use them.  Which was something I learned here in the forums.

I included a copy of a 2257 form.  I did not state that one didn't have a place for a social, I said some do and some don't. I picked that one because of the instruction sheet. That one also has a requirement for a witness.  I did not say that a model should not put her social on a 2257 form, but I did say that it is not a requirement.  I did ask you to show me a reliable source as to where a social is required on a 2257.  You have not.  I believe that is bad information on your part- and I wait to be shown otherwise.

I also photograph DLs,.  Photo IDs are required and if the government needs a social, the DL is tied to it.  Social Security numbers are not required per the statute.  Is it hard to understand that some people would require more than the law requires?  Kind of like why I do 2257s even though I believe that what I do doesn't require them?  ("Anyone can refuse to disclose his or her number, but the requester can refuse its services if you do not give it. Businesses, banks, schools, private agencies, etc., are free to request someone's number and use it for any purpose that does not violate a federal or state law. Sometimes they will issue a different number if you ask."  from SSA)

I did not say that a model should never give out her social security number.  I did say that the EIN is a better choice.  I did say that putting a social on an (every) invoice is a bad idea.

I did say a W-9 might be required.  I did say a 1099 might be required, but they are not required with every transaction totaling over $600 a year.  You have not disputed that.

If I am sharing bad information, fine.  Correct me.  But use verifiable facts, please.   A social is a sensitive piece of information and it shouldn't be given out without a real need.

I live in the real world too, Mo.  One where facts matter.

This is straight from the act:
(b) Any person to whom subsection (a) applies shall, with respect to every performer portrayed in a visual depiction of actual sexually explicit conduct-

(1) ascertain, by examination of an identification document containing such information, the performer's name and date of birth, and require the performer to provide such other indicia of his or her identity as may be prescribed by regulations;

(2) ascertain any name, other than the performer's present and correct name, ever used by the performer including maiden name, alias, nickname, stage, or professional name; and

(3) record in the records required by subsection (a) the information required by paragraphs (1) and (2) of this subsection and such other identifying information as may be prescribed by regulation.

https://uscode.house.gov/browse/prelim@ … on=prelim. punch in 18 under title and 2257 under section

OP, ultimately, it always better to get legal advice from lawyers rather than people using their own experiences and interpretations.

Jan 14 23 03:52 pm Link

Photographer

Patrick Walberg

Posts: 45205

San Juan Bautista, California, US

Hunter  GWPB wrote:
OP, ultimately, it always better to get legal advice from lawyers rather than people using their own experiences and interpretations.

Disclaimer;  I am NOT an attorney!  Even a tax attorney would say speak to them directly as every case could be different.  As a hypothetical, I would say that unless you are getting large sums of cash payments from someone you know is reporting the shoot as a business expense, a smaller amount of cash is very difficult to track without records.  Do what you feel is best.  End of discussion.

Jan 14 23 11:16 pm Link

Artist/Painter

Hunter GWPB

Posts: 8197

King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, US

In regard to 2257 and why I do not believe I am subject to 2257, but feel I should do the forms anyway-  just in case.

The text of the act includes:
(a)Whoever produces any book, magazine, periodical, film, videotape, digital image, digitally- or computer-manipulated image of an actual human being, picture, or other matter which—
(1)contains one or more visual depictions made after November 1, 1990 of actual sexually explicit conduct; and
(2)is produced in whole or in part with materials which have been mailed or shipped in interstate or foreign commerce, or is shipped or transported or is intended for shipment or transportation in interstate or foreign commerce;
shall create and maintain individually identifiable records pertaining to every performer portrayed in such a visual depiction.


According to section (a), anyone who produces any item on the list is subject if both subsection (1) and (2) apply.

In working with models, I often produce a digital image of an actual human being, a picture, or other material.  It seems like a picture would include a painting or sketches and other material would include a sculpture.  The law doesn't specify paintings, sketches or sculpture, but it is apparent they could qualify, even though those mediums may no longer represent an actual human being. 

Let's say I am at sketch club and a model is being drawn by the group.  I elongate the neck, mess up the proportions along the body, add some breast and subtract some hips, make the eyes too big and the mouth too small, and etc., etc..  Does the sketch/painting represent an actual human being because I started with an actual human being in front of me, even though there may not be a single person ever to whom that effort is a replica?  Is there ambiguity?

If I use one of the photos I shoot of a model as an art piece, in and of itself, then I am subject to section (a), to this point, because I have met the condition of subsection (1)- if there is actual sexually explicit conduct.  The rest is ambiguous, but anyone should be able to see why I would want to err on the side of caution considering the penalties are five years for the first offense and ten for each subsequent offense.

But, the wording is that section (a) only applies if subsections (1) and (2) are met.  In order to be subject to section (a), then the material I shoot, the digital images, must be "actual sexually explicit conduct."   I have never shot with multiple models at one time, so that limits the implication of me shooting, "actual sexually explicit conduct."  But what is "actual sexually explicit conduct?"  What if the model is touching their self?  What if it is a portrait and the facial expression is- erotic?  Does a model's expression "actual sexually explicit conduct?"  If I compose a painting of two women, who were never actually in the same place at the same time, and I illustrate them engaged in a kiss, or a gentle touch- a pose which I would consider non-sexual, such as one washing the other's back- is it an image that does or does not meet the subjective determination by a viewer "actual sexually explicit conduct?"  As of yet, I haven't created any such images, but wouldn't it seem prudent to have documentation corresponding to anything that I may manipulate with my paint brushes, or possibly with my computer to visually consider the scenes to paint?  Isn't it possible, that though an image was not of sexual conduct when I took the photo, it could qualify at a later, date depending on what I build from the raw materials? 

Furthermore, it is important to note that the final word of subsection (1) is the word and.  It is not either or or.  It is and, which means that section (a) does not apply unless subsection (2) is also true.  Subsection (2) could be true even if I never sell a single photo because I do share the fruits of a photoshoot with my models, and if she were to post one on social media, or sell an image, which they are welcome to do, then the conditions of subsection (2) are in effect.  Right?  And I as the producer is responsible even if others are moving the image around the world.

What if the photoshoot is in New Jersey and I bring the images home on the SD card in the camera?  Have I not transported the images across state lines?  What if I shoot, process and sell a photo print in Pennsylvania and the buyer transports it to Manhattan?  Am I then subject to 2257?

If I had never shared a pic with a model and I had never engaged in any transmission of a pic, there is always the possibility that I would some day in the future- even if it was due to the actions of other people.

Thinking through the possibilities and being prepared seems to be a reasonable course of action.  Others may disagree with the logic.  These are decisions we make for ourselves and we should ignore the indignant that don't understand our perspectives and those with an ax to grind.  We are responsible for our own actions.  Those that don't contemplate the possibilities are responsible for their actions, too.

Jan 15 23 06:05 pm Link