Forums >
Off-Topic Discussion >
Suicide, nudity and scams
Do not feed the energy creature. Apr 30 23 07:39 am Link Well, at least there's something to read on Model Mayhem now... Apr 30 23 08:55 am Link This should explain everything one needs to know about the OP, in his own words: "S Rob has brought his occult wisdom to many tasks and has a wide range of skills including but not limited to: predicting the future, he is an empathy and can literally feel what other people feel irrespective of distance, he can communicate with the dead (both people and animals), he can cast spells, lift curses, find lost objects and also push away evil entities, and also perform exorcisms. S Rob started to learn the occult at age five and has decades of experience. " https://www.srob.co.uk And not to miss: https://www.facebook.com/simon.rob.12/v … 261570678/ Con artist, indeed. Apr 30 23 10:16 am Link I don't know why people don't believe that I am trying to help I actually have a strong sense of social justice and am a member of Amnesty International and Liberty: both human right organisations. There really is a con woman out to con me: and god knows what else: and I take this as serious and a friend has been targeted by a group that con people too. I don't know how many other friends and occultists are suffering the same thing. We are a greatly discriminated against group in society it does seem there is a smidgen of bad feeling against me by some members: but hate me if you want but not for my beliefs there is no difference in hating a jew for being a jew or a muslim for being a muslim than hating an occultist because they believe in and practice magick. Apr 30 23 10:29 am Link Focuspuller wrote: Considering he claims to be above all else because he's a world famous author that wrote hundreds of books by many publishers, I find it quite ironic that most of his facebook 'likes' average 8 or 9 per post (including 'likes' from himself). Apr 30 23 10:37 am Link An intellectually astute person would postulate that a website comprised of those from beginners to experts would have a mode skill level in the realm of mediocre- certainly not expert, considering it is not an organization of experts, it would certainly be weighted in numbers towards less experienced members. The median skill set may be higher, but under what criteria is the determination of skill quantified? What are the values of the artistic and technical elements of the work? Are we bound to accept the position and conclusion of a jaded individual whining that others have not accepted him to be superior based on his own postering? Is there some qualification that the people participating in these forums must obtain an arbitrarily acceptable level of competence in the field they represent to post? If so, why is there a newbie section and why is it common to ask questions regarding technique and skill? It is interesting how people come to the forums, and rather than make a case for their argument through logic and coherent writing, they attempt to dismiss other people based on skills associated with the site but unassociated with the forums. Being that the forums are a place to discuss anything from the interests that bind us to the state of the world, an expert’s opinion would be more valuable regarding a subject in which that person has expertise, but that expertise is irrelevant in an unrelated conversation. A person that is an esteemed author would certainly be able to ascertain that the forums are an interlude within the site, while conducting the process of properly evaluating the nature of the site and the relationship of the features. I haven't seen this particular person’s resumé- just their boasting. I have noticed that he has posted false information under the assurances that he could be trusted- proving the opposite. When a person writes with a lack of coherence and grammar, does that seem inconsistent with a well published author producing quality literature? Are dime store novels the same as "A Tale of Two Cities?" Do they require the same skill? Hence, maybe it is possible that coherent discussion and grammar are not relevant to the success of an author? Does proliferation equate to quality? Quality, of course, is not required to be successful, but it seems it has been declared that quality is relative to the fitness of a person's ability to participate in the forums. Ergo, .... I suppose that one would conclude from my response that I have taken the comment leading to this response as an insult, rather than the obvious determination that the post which I responded to was an inept and petulant comment. Despite what some might think, a poorly determined conclusion does not automatically qualify as a truth. Apr 30 23 10:42 am Link I couldn't gave a shit that you are an occultist. It seems, however, that you are perpetuating the stereotypes for which occultists are scorned. Are you trying to help when you have neither the time or the inclination to tell us what it is that you are talking about? Apr 30 23 10:46 am Link Simon Rob wrote: I think we all understand the difference between (what you call) "hating" someone for their religion, and those that scam people by selling "magick spells" to enlarge their d*cks or breast enlargement, etc, etc. Apr 30 23 10:47 am Link LightDreams wrote: This is and will always be the blatantly obvious shortcoming of those who purport to "know all, including the future". Apr 30 23 10:56 am Link For the person that said quality isn't required for success that is utter crap do they have any idea how difficult it is to be a professional author these days. It is an incredibly competitive field. Plus what the hell is wrong with pulp fiction and dime store novels? Sir Arthur Conan Doyle came out of the penny dreadfuls one my favourite authors. Most modern culture is based on things that were produced in huge numbers. Apr 30 23 11:35 am Link statement redacted. A decent person shouldn't explode, and instead stay calm when dealing with a person with certified mental health issues such as those exhibited by the OP. I only wish that person would STOP creating posts and STOP hijacking other peoples threads only to BOAST about his mythical accomplishments as an author, publisher, and expert on whatever. As mentioned before "NOBODY GIVES A SHIT' even if ANY of it was true. Apr 30 23 11:44 am Link Simon Rob wrote: Realizing we are separated by a common language, in my plane of existence, if you know you are being conned, YOU CAN'T BE CONNED. Once you see the wizard is a huckster... Apr 30 23 12:09 pm Link Simon Rob wrote: Does the punctuation and presentation in the quoted post, give you any credibility as a writer? Apr 30 23 01:27 pm Link Hunter GWPB wrote: He imagines lots of things. Almost everything... except that. Apr 30 23 01:35 pm Link The method of torture was called pharmacological torture: that is its name everything you need to know is now available. Apr 30 23 02:24 pm Link Nope. That isn't the whole story. Why bring it up if you won't discuss it other than to create some type of self aggrandizing? Please link news articles which chronicled your story at the time or shortly thereafter. How about your memoir? Were there people who serve as witnesses which would collaborate any part of the story that have information that can be linked? And if you are an author, why didn't you properly punctuate the response? Not to , but come on- you are a professional. Maybe. Remember, none of this would be a topic if you had not, for some reason which remains a mystery, brought up these cause célèbre of your life. There is a lot of other stuff you voiced in this thread for which we are waiting for explanations. You have made lots of wild claims with very little support. . But, hey, "I am just asking questions here." “Why wouldn’t we ask questions about things like that?” Apr 30 23 02:56 pm Link Simon Rob wrote: Simon Rob wrote: Apr 30 23 02:58 pm Link It all adds up to what most people already thought. Your version of events vs reality: Your Pharmacological Torture = administered medicine for mental health treatment 'held hostage in an airport for a month' = spent a month in a mental institution 'scam artists from a few days ago appeared again with new identity and hair and makeup' = signs of paranoid schizophrenia 'best selling, world famous...' = delusions of grandeur, another sign of obvious mental health issues. Once again, please seek professional help. https://www.webmd.com/schizophrenia/delusions-grandeur Apr 30 23 03:11 pm Link It was invented in Guantamo bay and because it was designed to leave the torture victim ok I am ok today. Its basically where they give you a hallucinogenic drug and interrogate you. Its torture and an enhanced method of interrogation. I get it believe me if this is real the world is not how you think it is so decide it cannot be real. How can it not be real your own government does it to people it believes to be terrorists. I will not talk on torture anymore. I would hope you would understand but I doubt it. Apr 30 23 03:18 pm Link Simon Rob wrote: No, no. You brought it up. You probably have a deep need to discuss it as exemplified by the fact that you aren't just walking away. I am not a therapist or mental health expert, but I can listen to real shit without mocking you. Really, I can be emphatic- just don't snow me. Apr 30 23 03:32 pm Link Simon Rob wrote: Apr 30 23 07:43 pm Link So MANY things that Simon Rob suddenly, and completely out of the blue, claimed. And THEN insisted that he wouldn't talk about (riiiight....): - "when my first 12 books were published with the old Finbarr books and was followed around when everyone was released, or the KIDNAPPING, etc" - "In fact it is the BRAZILIAN POLICE THE TORTURED ME of which I PUT A PICTURE OF from afterwards: when I got home in another thread... NOTE I will not be talking of my torture here for any reason whatsoever." - "I believe that she is a FEMALE RAPIST and i know you will ask for SUPPORTING EVIDENCE BUT I WILL GIVE NONE... I HAVE KNOW FEMALE RAPIST BEFORE so can smell the buggers a mile off. I AM NOT GOING TO SAY WHAT I AM GOING TO DO BUT THINK ITS BLOODY OBVIOUS REALLY: and PLEASE YOU LOT DON'T SPECULATE" - "The method of torture was called pharmacological torture... It was invented in Guantamo bay and because it was designed to leave the torture victim ok I am ok today. Its basically where they give you a hallucinogenic drug and interrogate you. Its torture and an enhanced method of interrogation. ... I WILL NOT TALK ON TORTURE ANYMORE. I would hope you would understand but I doubt it." Of course, there were so many OTHER extremely wild claims that he also made out of the blue, and then went to great lengths to "talk about".. Take it all as you will. --- There is one that he HASN'T claimed. He (rather conspicuously) does not acknowledge writing ANY of George Santos' stuff. Hmmm, the Brazilian connection and "interrogation" that he REALLY "doesn't want to talk about"...??? It's all starting to make sense now! Apr 30 23 09:40 pm Link John Jebbia wrote: Under the fiction and entertainment section? Apr 30 23 09:56 pm Link Simon Rob wrote: If you are a writer, as you say, why do you use so many colons in your writing? They are not grammatically correct in the way that you are using them. Jun 29 23 07:17 am Link Simon Rob wrote: Omaroo wrote: Don't expect S Rob to answer. Jun 29 23 08:16 am Link Every once in a while, I come across a thread….whether it be on Instagram, Facebook, twitter, Reddit, wherever….and after I read through the entire thread, I am left with the feeling that this can only end with the police questioning everyone in it seeking pieces to a puzzle that unfolded in real life. And here I am again. Jun 30 23 02:46 am Link Simon Rob.....OP..... You've barely been in this community and I'm already tired of you. Jul 09 23 10:11 am Link Well i got into this thing via a scam. Someone I know has been dying for well over a year and early one it made me open to scams: got the money back though. But by the time my head cleared I was already in and thought may as well keep going. I got an agent but it has not been a wonderful success: been in a few online magazines: so maybe I was on the wrong track from the beginning. Ironically it was not the lure of looking a certain way but the lure of cash that drew me in. LOL They mentioned money and drew me in. What I don't understand is how you can get a legitimate agent and still not get work? The agent also covers extra work/walk on parts, presenting etc.. Maybe its because I do not drive or maybe the agent is on its past legs. It just does not seem like 1 casting a month is enough to find anything. I understand a male is disadvantaged at this thing and that the plus size male model thing is a scam with very little work. I don't think mature models do that well usually anyway. I think I will just stay with the agent and see if they ever bring me anything in. But this definately is not yielding the money it was supposed to. Don't get me wrong have been put in for decent jobs one was £800 + hotel stay and flight but don't get them. Maybe there is something wrong with my pictures. On their form you say if you need glasses and I do but only have half of my pictures wearing glasses and may glasses give quite a strong look which may not be that adaptable. Any feed back would be useful. I think I should to look at another way of making money and mixing my routine up. Don't fancy a regular job though that sounds crap. After all the extra money pulled me in maybe I should look at another flexible unconventional way of making money: or just stick to writing my day job. Sep 19 23 12:29 pm Link Simon Rob wrote: Finbarr books are still around but they have not published 12 books on occultism by the same author as far as I can tell from their website. Sep 29 23 04:07 am Link |