Bambi Graves wrote:
i know i havent been that active on the forums but something that irritates me are these people that post a rant about a situation when they were obviously in the wrong and the cant understand why everyone is 'attacking' them as one girl put it.
Why post something, ask for an opinion and then go off crying when you didnt hear what you wanted.

It's because what they really wanted was someone to hold their hand and coddle them and say "there there sweetie, it's ok, we'll get that bad photographer, just you wait!"
In other words, those threads are bad attempts at attention whoring.

MelissaLynnette-LaDiva wrote:

It's because what they really wanted was someone to hold their hand and coddle them and say "there there sweetie, it's ok, we'll get that bad photographer, just you wait!"
In other words, those threads are bad attempts at attention whoring.

it annoys me because if you are serious about modelling why on earth would you mention some of this stuff.
I am seriously worried about the lack of common sense of aspiring models. Newbies that think they will get paid straight away. I totally understand why you all get angry on here!

Urban Goddess wrote:
BUMP! (I've made the breast forum mistake once....never again lol)

if i didnt know what that was reference to it would have been abit worrying

Staci Marie wrote:

lmfao that reminds me of the one chick wanting to knwo how to shave her vagina..

wtf?lol

a properly shapped carrot peeler can work wonders on that pesky internal fur... important to flush and vacuum afterward though, cause otherwise the damned stuff just takes root again.

Jessalyn wrote:
here's one to add:

- As a model, you do not own the copyright to the images a photographer takes of you. Unless they have given you the copyrights, in writing, which is very very rare for them to do. Even if you pay for the shoot, you do not own the copyrights. Just like if you go to the store and buy "Borat" on DVD you do not own the copyright to that movie. You have only bought a sort of "license/release" to use that one copy.

modify to read in the USA. or just say you may not instead of do not. awareness of local laws is important. but true could just confuse... ok... nm...  what jessie said

oldguysrule wrote:

modify to read in the USA. or just say you may not instead of do not. awareness of local laws is important. but true could just confuse... ok... nm...  what jessie said

done, thanks

oldguysrule wrote:

a properly shapped carrot peeler can work wonders on that pesky internal fur... important to flush and vacuum afterward though, cause otherwise the damned stuff just takes root again.

LMAO ewwwwwwww i feel sick

Jessalyn wrote:
here's one to add:

- As a model, you do not own the copyright to the images a photographer takes of you. Unless they have given you the copyrights, in writing, which is very very rare for them to do. Even if you pay for the shoot, you do not own the copyrights. Just like if you go to the store and buy "Borat" on DVD you do not own the copyright to that movie. You have only bought a sort of "license/release" to use that one copy.

Edit: this applies to the USA, every country has different laws

as far as i know it is the same in the UK

oldguysrule wrote:

a properly shapped carrot peeler can work wonders on that pesky internal fur... important to flush and vacuum afterward though, cause otherwise the damned stuff just takes root again.

That was my favorite thread ever!  Until the day I die I will still get a stupid smile  on my face when I consider the acrobatics, logistics, and sensibility of shaving a vagina.  Adding a carrot peeler, a flush, and a vacuuming to it just demands that my wet/dry vac never be thought of the same way again.


BUMP to keep this USE THE SEARCH feature alive.

Bambi Graves wrote:

as far as i know it is the same in the UK

there are substantial differences. check with studio36uk 18055.

MelissaLynnette-LaDiva wrote:
Why on earth is this on the second page??

It's a travesty!!!!

L K wrote:
Pleaseeeeeeeeeeeeeee no vote for me thread.

for the sake of Bert and Ernie's baby

That's just WRONGGG!!!!
Lestari, you just destroyed all of my happy Sesame Street memories.

Crazy-Evil Angelus wrote:

That's just WRONGGG!!!!
Lestari, you just destroyed all of my happy Sesame Street memories.

Greg Kolack wrote:
How about not starting a thread to get back at someone and twist the facts and lie (ala photographer raped me of mind and body) because the thruth will eventually come out and you will be made to look like a real ass for starting the thread.

That's sound advice!
Don't forget "Don't ask dumb-ass questions about shaving your coochie"

Elise Holland wrote:
I am tired of people referring me to newmodels.com.  No, it doesn't answer even 1 of my questions and I have read through the whole thing twice!!

What questions does it not answer? If you have one, then that just might be a worthy thread.

In all honesty, it answers most newbie's questions regarding the "industry" that are commonly asked much, much better than most posters in most threads have, and it debunks a lot of very, very common "industry" myths. Myths which many, many people on this forum seem to perpetuate regardless anyhow. I do really wish more people would read this and pay attention to it. It's a pretty good page.

Marko Cecic-Karuzic wrote:
What questions does it not answer? If you have one, then that just might be a worthy thread.

In all honesty, it answers most newbie's questions regarding the "industry" that are commonly asked much, much better than most posters in most threads have, and it debunks a lot of very, very common "industry" myths. Myths which many, many people on this forum seem to perpetuate regardless anyhow. I do really wish more people would read this and pay attention to it. It's a pretty good page.

very much so agreed!!! wait...is this my 1000 post???? do i get my t-shirt!!!!!!!

EDIT: i am such a good guesser!!!!!!! i looked after i posted this and it is 1000 on the dot!!!!! TSHIRT TIME!!!!!!!!!!! woo hoo!!!!!!