Forums >
General Industry >
Model Killer: Dying to be Thin
Chris Keeling wrote: How is trying to emulate this body type a direct cause of an eating disorder? Nov 17 07 08:15 pm Link Brian Ziff wrote: Again, to me the issue isn't the outlying models who die from Eating Disorders, it's the people in the General Populace they influence. Nov 17 07 08:15 pm Link Nov 17 07 08:16 pm Link Dave Wright Photo SF wrote: You'd think wouldn't you? Unfortunately you nor I will ever be able to get in the head of a 14 yr. old girl. Nov 17 07 08:16 pm Link Bob Randall Photography wrote: Barry M Robinson wrote: No normal adult is a model at 66 pounds. my 6 year old son is 4 1/2 feet tall and weighs 85lbs Nov 17 07 08:17 pm Link Nov 17 07 08:17 pm Link sorry it posted 3x Nov 17 07 08:17 pm Link Nov 17 07 08:18 pm Link I'm beginning to think Chris has no experience in psychology, little to no understanding via personal experience OR education in eating disorders or body dysmorphia, or really any idea what the hell he's talking about. A friend of mine used to have a pin that said, "I refuse to have a battle of the wits with an unarmed opponent." Chris, what's the connection between the fashion industry and eating disorders? Break it down for us. Dave Wright Nov 17 07 08:18 pm Link Chris Keeling wrote: for the second time, can you show me the scientific research that has proven your point? Or, are you just making linkages without proof? Seems to me that folks making linkages like this have, throughout history vilified (or enslaved) other ethnic groups or religions --- after all, the problem with (ethnic Group A) is that they are just lazy drunkards and dullards --- just look at them --- my god, don't be naive -- just look at them -- all drunks. Nov 17 07 08:19 pm Link Dave Wright Photo SF wrote: Oops, Dave wants credit too. Nick and Dave have convinced me. Nov 17 07 08:20 pm Link Nov 17 07 08:21 pm Link Digitoxin wrote: For the third time, yes I'm too lazy, I've admitted this. Chris Keeling....Enslaver of Ethnic Groups and Religions (and the poor oppressed Fashion Industry) Nov 17 07 08:22 pm Link Dave Wright Photo SF wrote: I'm gonna quote you because the girls in these photos need to be seen again. Not one of them looks like they are dying from starvation. Nov 17 07 08:22 pm Link Nov 17 07 08:24 pm Link anorexxia is a form of obssessive compulsive disorder it turns out. there r antisyphchotic, um, antipsychotic drugs that pretty much make it go stop. it is not a behavioral problem and the reaon people die of anorexia is because stupid people treat it as a moral issue or a behavioral problem and its not. u can't "cure" anorexics by talking to them and u can't prevent it by removing thin people from a sufferer's view - but fluoxetine and quetiapine an stuff like that work. people dont want to take antipsychotics because it sounds oooh oooh so bad - but f*cking anorexia is just another (fairly easily treatable!) neuroligical problem. (edit - an by the way somethin like 20-30 people die of it a year. which is about the same number of people as break their necks falling down in bathtubs. oooh anorexia is a major medical skurge of epik proporshuns!) I do not support anorexia, tho. because anorexics usually lose their b(o)(o)bies and look gross. Nov 17 07 08:25 pm Link Nov 17 07 08:25 pm Link Special Ed wrote: Quoting statistic and images that say only a handfull of Fashion Models have died of eating disorders, is an absolutely irrelevant defense. I am not talking about the effect on Fashion Models, I am talking about the effect on the tweens and teens who try to emulate them, and again, to deny that the Fashion Industry doesn't have an effect on those girls in naive. Nov 17 07 08:27 pm Link Digitoxin wrote: Chris Keeling wrote: OK, then I will help you. It is my understanding (although I could easily be wrong) that there has not been a scientific study that has concluded that very thin models and the ads in which they appear (i.e. the amorphous "Fashion World" you speak of) have any effect on eating disorders in society at large. Nov 17 07 08:27 pm Link I kinda wish this phase was over.. It's unfortunate.. and a crazy issue. I believe I have an eating disorder.. I binge like crazy cuz I think I'm TOO SKINNY LMAO *dead serious too* I have a retarded metabolism.. and always want to gain weight.. even had a baby gained 60 pounds and went back down to my pre-baby weight. Ugh, I hate it.. I want to be thicker.. Nov 17 07 08:27 pm Link GWC wrote: qft. Nov 17 07 08:27 pm Link Nov 17 07 08:29 pm Link Nick Zantop wrote: What? No way!!! Nov 17 07 08:30 pm Link I wanna play the show an obscure pic as an example of your point game! Nov 17 07 08:32 pm Link Sinistre wrote: I have a friend like that who despises eating out because theres always some jerk (generally female) who will make a derogatory comment about how she must be bulimic to be that thin. I'm Vegan so I generally stay at the same weight but have to eat constantly to maintain it. Nov 17 07 08:34 pm Link Nov 17 07 08:34 pm Link That photo is from an article about ultra-thin models, which means it's the exception, not the rule. Sensationalism. It's a pretty simple concept. Dave Wright Nov 17 07 08:34 pm Link Dave Wright Photo SF wrote: I love these model's body's. Nov 17 07 08:38 pm Link Dave Wright Photo SF wrote: Visit this forum and you will find tons of models that are super thin. They also discuss celebs: http://www.thefashionspot.com/forums/f6 … 53149.html Nov 17 07 08:38 pm Link Raica wrote: Wrong. Nov 17 07 08:41 pm Link Nov 17 07 08:45 pm Link Dave Wright Photo SF wrote: You didn't click on the link did you? Nov 17 07 08:48 pm Link Dave Wright Photo SF wrote: right. Nov 17 07 08:49 pm Link For what it's worth the British Medical Association conducted a study in 2000 linking young womens views of body image to what they see in ads. Here's the press release article. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/769290.stm Nov 17 07 08:49 pm Link Chris Keeling wrote: Okay, how many people die or get injured trying to do stunts and extreme sports? Is it the TV shows that are to blame because they air the shows where kids watch and try to emulate on their own? Maybe it's the magazines where the "Pros" are glorified for what they do? Nov 17 07 08:50 pm Link Special Ed wrote: Well, I guess as long as someone else is doing it too, it's okay. After all, 2 wrongs make a right! Right? Nov 17 07 08:52 pm Link A few comments, if I may. My degree is in psychology and we spent a while studying anorexia in abnormal psych when I was an undergrad. Circa 1985 (when I was a senior) anorexia was believed to be a behavioral problem, but current research does indicate that it's very closely linked with obsessive-compulsive disorder - in fact, it's basically just another form of obsessive-compulsive disorder. What's interesting about OCD sufferers is that they appear to be genetically predisposed to a neurological condition in which they latch onto something and can no longer control it. It could be body image, or hand-washing, or lining things up, agoraphobia, or eating one's own hair, or any of a host of other "triggers." The problem is that the potential OCD sufferer is basically carrying around a neurological time-bomb that's waiting to go off based on their dopamine/serotonin levels. There's also a huge difference between clinically diagnosed anorexia and "body issues." True anorexia is a serious problem, where as having "body issues" is a fairly typical part of being female. There are actually good reasons rooted in evolutionary biology for why females are going to worry about their appearance - whether they can do anything about it, and regardless of the significance of the popular standards of beauty at the time. For example, women in the 18th century were extremely concerned about not getting freckles - to the point of going to extreme lengths to avoid sun, bleaching the skin, etc., all of which could be carried to extremes. Final observation: the "monkey see monkey do" argument "see thin models, want to be thin, become anorexic" is not very well-supported. In fact, it's the same argument that some people put forward hypothesizing that violent video games result in violent children (which is why violent crime rates in this country have been dropping consistently since the early 1990s) - the "monkey see monkey do" argument is usually only supported by hand-waving. It sort of makes intuitive sense to think that a psychologically fragile young woman might develop a weight obsession from seeing a thin model - but it's actually almost certain that every girl likely to obsess about her weight has been doing so since puberty and likely before. GWC appears to be right (though he's kind of incoherent) about the fact that anorexia can often be cured with antipsychotic drugs. Do your own reasearch - google "anorexia antipsychotic obsessive compulsive" and there's tons of literature out there on the topic. These are not opinions, these are controlled clinical results - and I think we should give more weight to controlled clinical results than to "monkey see monkey do" theories. Particularly regarding the relationship between anorexia and obsessive-compulsive disorder. If you've got a problem, and it triggers like OCD, acts like an OCD, and is treatable with the same (MAOI inhibitors, mostly) drugs - it's probably an OCD. "Monkey see monkey do" has no relationship to OCD at all, other than that its sufferers are going to trigger on something, no matter what it is. The topic of anorexia is very emotionally fraught for many people, but if you actually read about the mortality rates, you'll quickly conclude that society has got more important things to worry about. Nov 17 07 08:52 pm Link Nancy Catherine wrote: That's a good study. But - note - "body image" and obsessive-compulsive disorders are not the same thing. One is a behavioral and social problem while the other is a neurological condition. Nov 17 07 08:56 pm Link Marcus J. Ranum wrote: So see Nick, the Fashion Industry really doesn't have anything to do with women's low self worth or Eating Disorders. I was wrong, and you were right! Marcus says so. Nov 17 07 08:58 pm Link Oh, and if I may - to head off the inevitable discussion of "Body Mass Index"... Before you put any stock in BMI you should research the "science" behind it. Briefly it goes as follows: this Belgian guy named Quetelet in the mid 1800s thought it would be a good idea to have an "ideal height/weight chart" - so he made one. The way he did it was he took a bunch of his friends that he thought were especially well-proportioned and averaged them and grouped them by height. This provided an "ideal height/weight" (or, more precisely, "Quetelet's opinion") which was turned into "body mass index" (BMI) in the 1980s by turning Quetelet's chart into a curve-fitted formula. In other words, it looks like science but it is complete and utter bullsh*t. Nov 17 07 09:02 pm Link |